首页> 外文期刊>Culture, medicine and psychiatry >Reproducing hegemony: the culture of enhancement and discourses on amphetamines in popular fiction.
【24h】

Reproducing hegemony: the culture of enhancement and discourses on amphetamines in popular fiction.

机译:再现霸权:通俗小说中苯丙胺的增强文化和论述。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Chris Good's recent article in The Atlantic Monthly poses a question that is at the heart of recent research and debates in bioethics and medical anthropology. Since "performance-enhancers are increasingly part of our modern existence, despite our instinct to ban them," Good (2010) asks, "Why don't we use them for good?" He recommends providing drugs such as Adderall and Ritalin to scientists to foster productivity and creativity. While I cannot attest to Good's intentions, his question speaks to the unique social position of stimulant use in the United States (Grinspoon and Hedblom 1975; Rasmussen 2008). Amphetamines and their derivatives have, in fact, been used for these very purposes since the early 1900s (Rasmussen 2008).
机译:克里斯·古德(Chris Good)最近在《大西洋月刊》上发表的文章提出了一个问题,这是生物伦理学和医学人类学领域最近研究和辩论的核心。由于“尽管我们有禁令,性能增强器已越来越成为我们现代生活的一部分,” Good(2010)问道,“我们为什么不善用它们?”他建议向科学家提供Adderall和Ritalin等药物,以提高生产力和创造力。尽管我无法证明古德的意图,但他的问题谈到了美国使用兴奋剂的独特社会地位(Grinspoon和Hedblom 1975; Rasmussen 2008)。实际上,苯丙胺及其衍生物自1900年代初以来就已用于这些目的(Rasmussen 2008)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号