...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Nuclear Materials: Materials Aspects of Fission and Fusion >The recovery of irradiation damage for Zircaloy-2 and Zircaloy-4 following low dose neutron irradiation at nominally 358 degrees C
【24h】

The recovery of irradiation damage for Zircaloy-2 and Zircaloy-4 following low dose neutron irradiation at nominally 358 degrees C

机译:在标称358摄氏度低剂量中子辐照后Zircaloy-2和Zircaloy-4的辐照损伤恢复

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The recovery of irradiation damage in wrought Zircaloy-2 and Zircaloy-4 was determined following a series of post-irradiation anneals at temperatures ranging from 343 degrees C to 510 degrees C and for time periods ranging from 1-h to 500 h. The materials had been irradiated at nominally 358 degrees C in the High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) at neutron fluences of nominally 3 x 10(25) n/m(2) (E > 1 MeV). Irradiation at nominally 358 degrees C resulted in a coarser distribution of < a > loops that result in a 25-45% lower irradiation hardening than reported in the literature for irradiations at 260-326 degrees C. The irradiation hardening and recovery were determined using tensile testing at room-temperature. Post-irradiation annealing at 343-427 degrees C was shown to result in an increase in irradiation hardening to values even higher than for the as-irradiated material in the first 1-10 h of annealing. This Radiation Anneal Hardening (RAH) was followed by a relatively slow recovery of the irradiation damage. Much faster recovery with no RAH was observed for post-irradiation annealing at temperatures of 454-510 degrees C. Irradiation at 358 degrees C was shown to result in different recovery kinetics than observed in the literature for irradiation at 260-326 degrees C. While the general trend described above is true for the four materials tested (alpha-annealed and beta-treated Zircaloy-2 and Zircaloy-4), notable and yet unexplained differences in RAH and in recovery are observed between the materials that might be a result of differing solute effects. Examinations of microstructure using Transmission Electron Microscopy were used to investigate the RAH and recovery mechanisms. Agreement between the measured and calculated irradiation hardening using a generalized Orowan hardening model to account for the observed loop structure was not as close for the post irradiation annealed condition as for the as-irradiated condition, which can likely be attributed to unaccounted for changes in the configuration of the < a > loops to dislocation lines, segregation of solutes to dislocation loops, and the potential for the formation of fine clusters of point defects or solutes during annealing. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:在343°C至510°C的温度范围以及1-h至500h的时间范围内进行一系列的辐照后退火之后,确定了变形Zircaloy-2和Zircaloy-4中辐照损伤的恢复。该材料已在高通量同位素反应堆(HFIR)中以标称358℃,标称3 x 10(25)n / m(2)(E> 1 MeV)的中子辐照量进行了辐照。在标称358摄氏度下进行辐照会导致圈的分布更加粗糙,与260-326摄氏度下进行辐照相比,辐照硬化比文献中报道的辐照硬化要低25-45%。在室温下测试。结果表明,在343-427摄氏度下进行辐照后退火会导致辐照硬化增加到甚至比退火的前1-10 h辐照后的材料更高的值。此辐射退火硬化(RAH)之后,辐射损伤的恢复相对较慢。在454-510摄氏度的温度下进行辐照后退火时,观察到没有RAH的恢复速度要快得多。与在260-326摄氏度下进行辐照相比,在358摄氏度的辐照下显示出不同的恢复动力学。上述一般趋势对于所测试的四种材料(经α退火和β​​处理的Zircaloy-2和Zircaloy-4)是正确的,在两种材料之间观察到RAH和回收率方面的显着但尚未解释的差异可能是由于不同的溶质效应。使用透射电子显微镜检查微观结构用于研究RAH和恢复机制。使用广义的Orowan硬化模型在实测辐射强度和计算辐射强度之间达成一致以说明观察到的回路结构,对于辐照后退火条件而言,与照原样条件相比,并没有那么接近,这很可能归因于未解释环到位错线的构型,溶质向位错环的分离,以及在退火过程中形成点缺陷或溶质的精细簇的可能性。 (C)2015 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号