...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of chromatography, A: Including electrophoresis and other separation methods >Analytical performance of three commonly used extraction methods for the gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis of wine volatile compounds
【24h】

Analytical performance of three commonly used extraction methods for the gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis of wine volatile compounds

机译:酒中挥发性成分的气相色谱-质谱分析三种常用萃取方法的分析性能

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The analytical performance of three extraction procedures based oil cold liquid-liquid extraction using dicloromethane (LLE), solid phase extraction (SPE) using a styrene-divirlylbenzene copolymer and headspace solid phase microextraction (SPME) using a carboxen-polydimethylsiloxane coated fibre has been evaluated based on the analysis of 30 representative wine volatile compounds. From the comparison of the three procedures, LLE and SPE showed very good linearity covering a wide range of concentrations of wine volatile compounds, low detection limits, high recovery for most of the volatile compounds under study and higher sensitivity compared to the headspace-SPME procedure. The latter showed in general, poor recovery for polar volatile compounds. Despite some drawbacks associated with the LLE and SPE procedures such as the more tedious sampling treatment and the use of organic solvents, the analytical performance of both procedures showed that they are more adequate for the analysis of wine volatiles.
机译:评估了以下三种萃取程序的分析性能:使用双氯甲烷(LLE)的油冷液-液萃取,使用苯乙烯-二烯丙基苯共聚物的固相萃取(SPE)和使用羧基-聚二甲基硅氧烷涂覆的纤维的顶空固相微萃取(SPME)基于对30种代表性葡萄酒挥发性成分的分析。通过三种方法的比较,LLE和SPE表现出很好的线性,涵盖了葡萄酒挥发性化合物的各种浓度范围,低检出限,所研究的大多数挥发性化合物的高回收率以及与顶空-SPME方法相比更高的灵敏度。后者一般显示极性挥发性化合物的回收率很低。尽管LLE和SPE程序存在一些缺点,例如较繁琐的采样处理和有机溶剂的使用,但两种程序的分析性能均表明它们更适合用于分析葡萄酒中的挥发物。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号