首页> 外文期刊>JAMA: the Journal of the American Medical Association >Response rates and nonresponse errors in surveys
【24h】

Response rates and nonresponse errors in surveys

机译:调查中的回应率和无回应错误

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

AS PERHAPS THE MOST WELL KNOWN OF ALL social science methodologies, survey research findings are commonly reported in the professional literature. Indeed, many biomedical journals routinely publish articles that report results from high-quality survey studies. Discerning unbiased survey findings can be challenging, however, to both editors and readers, necessitating some reflection as to the multiple sources of error in surveys and how to assess them. In this Viewpoint, we provide an overview of one of these sources of survey error-nonresponse bias-and briefly consider approaches for estimating, evaluating, and reporting it.
机译:作为研究所有社会科学方法中最众所周知的方法,调查研究发现通常在专业文献中进行报道。确实,许多生物医学期刊定期发表文章,报道高质量调查研究的结果。然而,辨别公正的调查结果可能对编辑和读者都具有挑战性,需要对调查错误的多种来源及其评估方法进行反思。在此观点中,我们概述了调查误差-无响应偏差中的一种来源,并简要考虑了估计,评估和报告该误差的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号