首页> 外文期刊>JAMA: the Journal of the American Medical Association >Primary care physician workforce and Medicare beneficiaries' health outcomes.
【24h】

Primary care physician workforce and Medicare beneficiaries' health outcomes.

机译:初级保健医师队伍和Medicare受益人的健康状况。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

CONTEXT: Despite a widespread interest in increasing the numbers of primary care physicians to improve care and to moderate costs, the relationship of the primary care physician workforce to patient-level outcomes remains poorly understood. OBJECTIVE: To measure the association between the adult primary care physician workforce and individual patient outcomes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A cross-sectional analysis of the outcomes of a 2007 20% sample of fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years or older (N = 5,132,936), which used 2 measures of adult primary care physicians (general internists and family physicians) across Primary Care Service Areas (N = 6542): (1) American Medical Association (AMA) Masterfile nonfederal, office-based physicians per total population and (2) office-based primary care clinical full-time equivalents (FTEs) per Medicare beneficiary derived from Medicare claims. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Annual individual-level outcomes (mortality, ambulatory care sensitive condition [ACSC] hospitalizations, and Medicare program spending), adjusted for individual patient characteristics and geographic area variables. RESULTS: Marked variation was observed in the primary care physician workforce across areas, but low correlation was observed between the 2 primary care workforce measures (Spearman r = 0.056; P < .001). Compared with areas with the lowest quintile of primary care physician measure using AMA Masterfile counts, beneficiaries in the highest quintile had fewer ACSC hospitalizations (74.90 vs 79.61 per 1000 beneficiaries; relative rate [RR], 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.93-0.95), lower mortality (5.38 vs 5.47 per 100 beneficiaries; RR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.97-0.997), and no significant difference in total Medicare spending (Dollars 8722 vs Dollars 8765 per beneficiary; RR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.99-1.00). Beneficiaries residing in areas with the highest quintile of primary care clinician FTEs compared with those in the lowest quintile had lower mortality (5.19 vs 5.49 per 100 beneficiaries; RR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.93-0.96), fewer ACSC hospitalizations (72.53 vs 79.48 per 1000 beneficiaries; RR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.90-0.92), and higher overall Medicare spending (Dollars 8857 vs Dollars 8769 per beneficiary; RR, 1.01; 95% CI, 1.004-1.02). CONCLUSION: A higher level of primary care physician workforce, particularly with an FTE measure that may more accurately reflect ambulatory primary care, was generally associated with favorable patient outcomes.
机译:背景:尽管人们普遍希望增加基层医疗医生的人数以改善护理水平并降低成本,但对基层医疗医生劳动力与患者水平结果之间的关系仍然知之甚少。目的:测量成年初级保健医师劳动力与个体患者预后之间的关联。设计,地点和参与者:对2007年20%的65岁以上老年有偿医疗保险受益人(N = 5,132,936)的样本进行了横断面分析,该样本使用了2种成人基层医疗医生的措施(初级保健服务区域(N = 6542)的普通内科医师和家庭医生):(1)美国医学协会(AMA)占总人口的非联邦,非办公室医生,以及(2)基于办公室的初级保健临床全日制(FTE)由Medicare索赔得出的每个Medicare受益人。主要观察指标:根据个人患者特征和地理区域变量对年度个人水平结局(死亡率,非卧床护理敏感病情[ACSC]住院和Medicare计划支出)进行调整。结果:在各地区的初级保健医师劳动力中观察到显着差异,但在两种初级保健劳动力指标之间观察到较低的相关性(Spearman r = 0.056; P <.001)。与使用AMA Masterfile计数得出的基层医疗医师最低的五分之一地区相比,最高的五分之一受益人的ACSC住院次数更少(每1000受益人74.90 vs 79.61;相对比率[RR]为0.94; 95%可信区间[CI], 0.93-0.95),较低的死亡率(每100名受益人5.38比5.47; RR,0.98; 95%CI,0.97-0.997),且医疗保险总支出无显着差异(美元8722对8765美元/每名受益者; RR,1.00; 95 %CI,0.99-1.00)。与初级保健临床医生FTE最高的五分之一地区相比,最低五分位数的受益者死亡率较低(每100名受益者5.19比5.49; RR为0.95; 95%CI为0.93-0.96),ACSC住院人数较少(72.53 vs每千名受益人79.48; RR,0.91; 95%CI,0.90-0.92),以及更高的整体医疗保险支出(每位受益人8857美元对8769美元的美元; RR,1.01; 95%CI,1.004-1.02)。结论:较高水平的初级保健医师队伍,特别是采用FTE措施,可以更准确地反映非卧床初级保健,通常与患者预后良好相关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号