首页> 外文期刊>JAMA: the Journal of the American Medical Association >Oral vs intratympanic corticosteroid therapy for idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss: a randomized trial.
【24h】

Oral vs intratympanic corticosteroid therapy for idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss: a randomized trial.

机译:口服与鼓膜内注射皮质类固醇激素治疗特发性突然感觉神经性听力损失:一项随机试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

CONTEXT: Idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss has been treated with oral corticosteroids for more than 30 years. Recently, many patients' symptoms have been managed with intratympanic steroid therapy. No satisfactory comparative effectiveness study to support this practice exists. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of oral vs intratympanic steroid to treat sudden sensorineural hearing loss. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Prospective, randomized, noninferiority trial involving 250 patients with unilateral sensorineural hearing loss presenting within 14 days of onset of 50 dB or higher of pure tone average (PTA) hearing threshold. The study was conducted from December 2004 through October 2009 at 16 academic community-based otology practices. Participants were followed up for 6 months. INTERVENTION: One hundred twenty-one patients received either 60 mg/d of oral prednisone for 14 days with a 5-day taper and 129 patients received 4 doses over 14 days of 40 mg/mL of methylprednisolone injected into the middle ear. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary end point was change in hearing at 2 months after treatment. Noninferiority was defined as less than a 10-dB difference in hearing outcome between treatments. RESULTS: In the oral prednisone group, PTA improved by 30.7 dB compared with a 28.7-dB improvement in the intratympanic treatment group. Mean pure tone average at 2 months was 56.0 for the oral steroid treatment group and 57.6 dB for the intratympanic treatment group. Recovery of hearing on oral treatment at 2 months by intention-to-treat analysis was 2.0 dB greater than intratympanic treatment (95.21% upper confidence interval, 6.6 dB). Per-protocol analysis confirmed the intention-to-treat result. Thus, the hypothesis of inferiority of intratympanic methylprednisolone to oral prednisone for primary treatment of sudden sensorineural hearing loss was rejected. CONCLUSION: Among patients with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss, hearing level 2 months after treatment showed that intratympanic treatment was not inferior to oral prednisone treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00097448.
机译:背景:特发性突然的感音神经性听力损失已经使用口服皮质类固醇治疗了30多年。最近,许多患者的症状已经通过鼓膜内类固醇疗法得到了缓解。没有令人满意的比较效果研究来支持这种做法。目的:比较口服和鼓膜内类固醇治疗突然的感音神经性听力损失的有效性。设计,地点和患者:前瞻性,随机,非劣效性试验,涉及250例单侧感觉神经性听力损失的患者,发病时间在14 dB或更高的纯音平均(PTA)听阈阈值之内。该研究于2004年12月至2009年10月在16个基于学术社区的耳科实践中进行。参加者随访6个月。干预:一百二十一例患者接受60 mg / d口服泼尼松治疗,持续5天,持续5天; 129例患者于14天接受4剂40 mg / mL甲基泼尼松龙注入中耳。主要观察指标:主要终点是治疗后2个月的听力变化。非劣效性定义为两次治疗之间的听力结果差异小于10 dB。结果:口服泼尼松组的PTA改善了30.7 dB,而鼓膜内治疗组的PTA改善了28.7 dB。口服类固醇治疗组在2个月时的平均纯音平均为56.0,鼓膜内治疗组为57.6 dB。通过意向性治疗分析,口服治疗2个月时的听力恢复比鼓膜内治疗高2.0 dB(95.21%的置信区间为6.6 dB)。方案分析证实了治疗意向结果。因此,驳斥了鼓膜内甲基强的松龙不如口服泼尼松用于突然的感音神经性听力损失的初级治疗的假设。结论:特发性突然感觉神经性听力下降的患者中,治疗后2个月的听力水平显示鼓膜内治疗不逊于口服泼尼松治疗。试验注册:clinicaltrials.gov标识符:NCT00097448。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号