首页> 外文期刊>Transplantation Proceedings >Infection risk in kidney transplantation from uncontrolled donation after circulatory death donors
【24h】

Infection risk in kidney transplantation from uncontrolled donation after circulatory death donors

机译:循环死亡捐献者无偿捐献导致肾脏移植的感染风险

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Uncontrolled donations after circulatory death (DCD) present 2 well-established risk factors for infection after kidney transplantation (KT): greater rates of delayed graft function (DGF) and antithymocyte globulin (ATG)-containing sequential therapies. Methods: We performed a prospective cohort study of our 291 KT patients between November 2008 and July 2011 to compare the incidences of infection between DCD (n = 87) and donation after brain death (DBD; n = 204) recipients. Most DCD donors were uncontrolled Maastricht categories 1 or 2. Backward stepwise Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the impact of DCD on the primary study outcome. Results: As compared to the DBD group, DCD recipients were younger, less likely to have undergone previous transplantations, exhibited lower dialysis vintage, and displayed a greater incidence of DGF and graft loss, but lower incidence of acute rejection episodes. There were no differences in the non-death-censored graft survival at 2 years (log-rank P =.835). The DCD group showed lower cumulative incidences of overall, bacterial, cytomegalovirus (CMV), and non-CMV viral infections (P <.05 for all). Multivariate analysis, associated DCD with a lower risk of overall infection (hazard ratio: 0.41; 95% confidence interval: 0.28-0.60; P =.012), an effect that remained when the analysis was restricted to patients receiving ATG induction therapy. Finally, there were no differences in the cumulative incidence of overall infection when DCD recipients were compared with age-matched DBD controls: 43.7% vs 47.1% respectively (P =.648). Conclusion: Despite the higher rate of DGF and the use of ATG-containing sequential therapy, uncontrolled DCD policies were safe in terms of the risk of post-transplant infection.
机译:背景:循环死亡后无节制的捐赠(DCD)是肾移植(KT)后感染的两个公认的危险因素:延迟移植功能(DGF)和含抗胸腺细胞球蛋白(ATG)的序贯治疗率更高。方法:我们在2008年11月至2011年7月之间对291名KT患者进行了一项前瞻性队列研究,以比较DCD(n = 87)和脑死亡后捐献(DBD; n = 204)受者之间的感染发生率。大多数DCD捐助者是不受控制的马斯特里赫特(Maastricht)1类或2类。使用向后逐步Cox比例风险模型评估DCD对主要研究结果的影响。结果:与DBD组相比,DCD接受者年龄较小,接受过先前的移植的可能性较小,透析时间较低,DGF和移植物丢失的发生率较高,但急性排斥反应的发生率较低。在2年时,未经死亡检查的移植物存活率没有差异(log-rank P = .835)。 DCD组显示总体,细菌,巨细胞病毒(CMV)和非CMV病毒感染的累积发生率较低(所有P均<0.05)。多变量分析将DCD与总体感染风险降低相关(危险比:0.41; 95%置信区间:0.28-0.60; P = .012),这种分析仅限于接受ATG诱导治疗的患者。最后,将DCD接受者与年龄匹配的DBD对照者进行比较,总体感染的累积发生率没有差异:分别为43.7%和47.1%(P = .648)。结论:尽管DGF的发生率较高且使用了ATG序贯治疗,但就移植后感染的风险而言,不受控制的DCD策略是安全的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号