首页> 外文期刊>Current Biology: CB >Erroneous quadruped walking depictions in nuatural history museums
【24h】

Erroneous quadruped walking depictions in nuatural history museums

机译:自然历史博物馆中错误的四足行走描述

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Since the work of the photographer Eadweard Muybridge in the 1880s [1] and [2], experts know well how quadruped animals walk. All walking tetrapods advance their legs in the same sequence, and only the timing of supporting feet may differ [3], [4], [5] and [6]. Given the long time since Muybridge's work, one would assume that this knowledge should be reflected in the depictions of walking quadrupeds made by work of painters, taxidermists, anatomists and toy designers. The postures of legs of walkinghorses, however, are frequently erroneously illustrated in the fine arts [7]. To see if this also applies to museums, veterinary books and toy shops, we collected hundreds of walking depictions and tested whether or not they correctly display limb positions. We found that almost half of the depictions are wrong. This high error rate in walking illustrations in natural history museums and veterinary anatomy books is particularly unexpected in a time where high-speed cameras and the internet offer ideal possibilities to obtain reliable quantitative information about tetrapod walking.
机译:自从1880年代摄影师[Eadweared Muybridge]的作品[1]和[2]以来,专家们就很清楚四足动物如何行走。所有行走的四脚架都以相同的顺序前进腿,只有支撑脚的时机可能有所不同[3],[4],[5]和[6]。鉴于Muybridge的工作已经有很长的时间了,人们会认为,这种知识应该反映在画家,动物标本制作者,解剖学家和玩具设计师的作品中对四足动物的描绘中。然而,在美术界经常错误地说明步行马的腿部姿势[7]。为了了解这是否也适用于博物馆,兽书和玩具店,我们收集了数百个步行描绘,并测试了它们是否正确显示了肢体位置。我们发现几乎有一半的描述是错误的。在高速摄影机和互联网为获取有关四脚架行走的可靠定量信息提供理想可能性的时代,自然历史博物馆和兽医解剖学书籍中的行走插图中的这种高错误率尤其令人意外。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号