首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Urology >The relevance of social media and online reviews for urological practice: Some questions and some answers
【24h】

The relevance of social media and online reviews for urological practice: Some questions and some answers

机译:社交媒体和在线评论与泌尿科实践的相关性:一些问题和一些答案

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this issue of The Journal Ellimoottil et al (page 2269) address the subject of online reviews of urologists by patients.1 The authors report their results of urologists' ratings on 10 popular free physician review websites (PRWs) as well as a smaller number of written comments on one of those sites. They found that approximately 80% of the random sample of 500 urologists had been rated on at least 1 site, and concluded, "We advise physicians and patients to be aware that most urologists are rated on at least 1 PRW, and that while most ratings and reviews are favorable, composite scores are typically based on a small number of reviews and, therefore, can be volatile." While this particular study may raise more
机译:Ellimoottil等人(第2269页)在本期杂志中探讨了患者对泌尿科医师进行在线评论的主题。1作者在10个受欢迎的免费医师评论网站(PRW)上报告了泌尿科医师的评分结果,并且报告的数量较少这些网站之一上的书面评论。他们发现,在500名泌尿科医师的随机样本中,大约80%已在至少1个部位进行了评级,并得出结论:“我们建议医师和患者注意,大多数泌尿科医师均在至少1个PRW上进行评级,而大多数评级并且评论是有利的,综合得分通常基于少量评论,因此可能会波动。”虽然这项特殊的研究可能会带来更多

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号