首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Urology >A prospective, randomized clinical trial comparing plasmakinetic resection of the prostate with holmium laser enucleation of the prostate based on a 2-year followup
【24h】

A prospective, randomized clinical trial comparing plasmakinetic resection of the prostate with holmium laser enucleation of the prostate based on a 2-year followup

机译:一项基于2年随访的比较前列腺癌的血浆动力学切除术和激光摘除术的前瞻性随机临床试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose: We compared plasmakinetic resection with holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia by analyzing 2-year followup data from a prospective randomized clinical trial. Materials and Methods: A total of 280 patients were randomly treated with plasmakinetic resection or holmium laser enucleation of the prostate. Perioperative and postoperative outcome data were obtained during a 2-year followup. Results: No significant differences between the 2 surgical groups were observed in the preoperative data. Both groups displayed significant improvements after surgery. However, we identified no significant differences between the 2 groups in the 2-year followup data for I-PSS (International Prostate Symptom Score), quality of life scores or maximum flow rate values. Patients in the holmium laser enucleation group displayed a lower risk of hemorrhage, shorter bladder irrigation and catheter times, and shorter hospital stays. A larger amount of prostate tissue was retrieved in the holmium laser enucleation group, but the operation time was longer for this group than for the plasmakinetic resection group. Conclusions: Plasmakinetic resection and holmium laser enucleation of the prostate are effective and safe treatments for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate can be applied to prostates of all sizes, and involves less risk of hemorrhage, decreased bladder irrigation and catheter times, as well as reduced hospital stay. Thus, we believe holmium laser enucleation of the prostate should be proposed as a potential new gold standard surgical therapy instead of transurethral resection of the prostate for patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. ? 2013 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.
机译:目的:我们通过分析一项前瞻性随机临床试验的2年随访数据,比较了血浆动力学切除术与前列腺激光摘除术治疗良性前列腺增生的疗效。材料与方法:总共280例患者接受了血浆动力学切除术或hol激光摘除术对前列腺进行了随机治疗。在2年的随访期间获得围手术期和术后的结局数据。结果:两组手术前的数据无明显差异。两组术后均显示出明显改善。但是,我们在I-PSS(国际前列腺症状评分),生活质量评分或最大流速值的2年随访数据中没有发现两组之间有显着差异。 laser激光摘除术组的患者出血风险较低,膀胱冲洗和导管时间较短,住院时间也较短。 laser激光摘除术组可回收大量前列腺组织,但该组的手术时间比血浆动力学切除术组更长。结论:前列腺电浆切除和激光摘除术是治疗前列腺增生的有效且安全的方法。 laser激光摘除术可应用于各种大小的前列腺,出血风险降低,膀胱冲洗和导管次数减少,住院时间减少。因此,我们认为对于良性前列腺增生患者,应该建议采用激光摘除术作为潜在的新金标准手术疗法,而不是经尿道前列腺切除术。 ? 2013美国泌尿科协会教育与研究公司

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号