首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Immunology: Official Journal of the American Association of Immunologists >Differential type I IFN-inducing abilities of wild-type versus vaccine strains of measles virus.
【24h】

Differential type I IFN-inducing abilities of wild-type versus vaccine strains of measles virus.

机译:野生型疫苗与麻疹病毒疫苗株的I型IFN诱导差异能力。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Laboratory adapted and vaccine strains of measles virus (MV) induced type I IFN in infected cells. The wild-type strains in contrast induced it to a far lesser extent. We have investigated the mechanism for this differential type I IFN induction in monocyte-derived dendritic cells infected with representative MV strains. Laboratory adapted strains Nagahata and Edmonston infected monocyte-derived dendritic cells and activated IRF-3 followed by IFN-beta production, while wild-type MS failed to activate IRF-3. The viral IRF-3 activation is induced within 2 h, an early response occurring before protein synthesis. Receptor usage of CD46 or CD150 and nucleocapsid (N) protein variations barely affected the strain-to-strain difference in IFN-inducing abilities. Strikingly, most of the IFN-inducing strains possessed defective interference (DI) RNAs of varying sizes. In addition, an artificially produced DI RNA consisting of stem (the leader and trailer of MV) and loop (the GFP sequence) exhibited potential IFN-inducing ability. In this case, however, cytoplasmic introduction was needed for DI RNA to induce type I IFN in target cells. By gene-silencing analysis, DI RNA activated the RIG-I/MDA5-mitochondria antiviral signaling pathway, but not the TLR3-TICAM-1 pathway. DI RNA-containing strains induced IFN-beta mRNA within 2 h while the same recombinant strains with no DI RNA required >12 h postinfection to attain similar levels of IFN-beta mRNA. Thus, the stem-loop structure, rather than full genome replication or specific internal sequences of the MV genome, is required for an early phase of type I IFN induction by MV in host cells.
机译:实验室适应的麻疹病毒(MV)疫苗株在感染细胞中诱导了I型干扰素。相反,野生型菌株在较小程度上诱导了它。我们已经研究了在代表性MV株感染的单核细胞来源的树突状细胞中这种差异型I IFN诱导的机制。经过实验室改造的菌株Nagahata和Edmonston感染了单核细胞衍生的树突状细胞,并激活了IRF-3,随后产生IFN-β,而野生型MS未能激活IRF-3。病毒IRF-3活化在2小时内被诱导,这是蛋白质合成之前的早期反应。 CD46或CD150受体的使用以及核衣壳(N)蛋白变异几乎不影响IFN诱导能力之间的差异。令人惊讶的是,大多数诱导IFN的菌株都具有大小不等的缺陷干扰(DI)RNA。此外,由茎(MV的前导和尾随)和环(GFP序列)组成的人工产生的DI RNA表现出潜在的IFN诱导能力。然而,在这种情况下,DI RNA诱导靶细胞中的I型干扰素需要胞质导入。通过基因沉默分析,DI RNA激活了RIG-I / MDA5-线粒体抗病毒信号通路,但未激活TLR3-TICAM-1通路。含DI RNA的菌株可在2 h内诱导IFN-βmRNA,而没有DI RNA的相同重组菌株在感染后大于12 h需要达到相似水平的IFN-beta mRNA。因此,宿主细胞中MV诱导I型IFN的早期阶段需要茎环结构而不是MV基因组的完整基因组复制或特定内部序列。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号