首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Chemical Physics >Performance of the M11-L density functional for bandgaps and lattice constants of unary and binary semiconductors
【24h】

Performance of the M11-L density functional for bandgaps and lattice constants of unary and binary semiconductors

机译:M11-L密度函数对一元和二进制半导体的带隙和晶格常数的性能

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The recently developed SOGGA11 and M11-L density functionals have been tested for the prediction of bandgaps and lattice constants by comparing to databases containing 31 bandgaps and 34 lattice constants. To make a comparative assessment we also test several other density functionals against the same databases; in particular, we test the local spin density approximation, PBE, PBEsol, SOGGA, TPSS, revTPSS, and M06-L local density functionals and the HSE screened-exchange hybrid nonlocal density functional; and for a subset of 13 lattice constants we also compare the mean errors to those of the AM05 and WC local density functionals and the HISS and HSEsol nonlocal density functionals. The tests show that, of the ten functionals tested against all 65 data, the SOGGA, PBEsol, and HSE functionals are the most accurate for lattice constants, whereas the HSE, M11-L, and M06-L density functionals are the most accurate for bandgaps. However, the SOGGA11 density functional is the most accurate generalized gradient approximation for bandgaps.
机译:通过与包含31个带隙和34个晶格常数的数据库进行比较,已经测试了最近开发的SOGGA11和M11-L密度泛函用于预测带隙和晶格常数。为了进行比较评估,我们还针对相同的数据库测试了其他几个密度函数。特别是,我们测试了局部自旋密度近似值,PBE,PBEsol,SOGGA,TPSS,revTPSS和M06-L局部密度函数以及HSE筛选交换混合非局部密度函数;对于13个晶格常数的子集,我们还将平均误差与AM05和WC局部密度函数以及HISS和HSEsol非局部密度函数的平均误差进行比较。测试表明,针对全部65个数据测试的十个功能中,SOGGA,PBEsol和HSE功能对于晶格常数最准确,而HSE,M11-L和M06-L密度功能对于晶格常数最准确。带隙。但是,SOGGA11密度泛函是带隙的最精确的广义梯度近似。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号