首页> 外文期刊>Urology >Office-based ureteral stent placement under local anesthesia for obstructing stones is safe and efficacious
【24h】

Office-based ureteral stent placement under local anesthesia for obstructing stones is safe and efficacious

机译:在局麻下放置输尿管支架以阻塞结石是安全有效的

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: To evaluate the outcomes of urgent ureteral stent placement under local anesthesia (LA) with those placed under general anesthesia (GA) for obstructing stones. Materials and Methods: After institutional review board approval, ureteral stents placed from January 2007 to July 2011 at our institution were reviewed. Only primary stent placement for obstructing renal or ureteral calculi was included in the present analysis. Data were evaluated for 2 groups: GA and LA. The primary outcomes were demographics, interval from presentation to stent insertion, interval from stent insertion to stone removal, success and complication rates, and secondary outcomes were costs per encounter. Results: A total of 119 primary stent insertion procedures in 110 unique patients were assessed; 73 (GA) and 46 (LA). No differences were found in the mean age or sex between the 2 groups. Both GA and LA groups were stented within 12 hours of presentation, at 58% and 54%, respectively (P = .69); and the interval from stent insertion to stone removal was similar in both groups (mean 33 days and 35 days in the GA and LA groups, respectively, P =.79). No significant differences were found in the failure to place the stent between the GA and LA groups (1.3% vs 8.7%, respectively, P =.07). No complications related to stent placement occurred in either group. The average cost per encounter was nearly 4 times greater in the GA group. Conclusion: Urgent ureteral stent placement for obstructing stones can be safely and effectively performed under LA in the office. Although avoiding GA and reducing costs, this approach did not prolong the interval to definitive stone management. ? 2013 Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.
机译:目的:评估局部麻醉(LA)下紧急输尿管支架置入和全麻(GA)放置输尿管支架置入结石的效果。材料与方法:经过机构审查委员会的批准,我们对2007年1月至2011年7月在我院放置的输尿管支架进行了审查。本分析仅包括用于阻塞肾或输尿管结石的主要支架置入。评估了两组数据:GA和LA。主要结局为人口统计学,从呈报至支架置入的间隔,从支架置入至结石清除的间隔,成功率和并发症发生率,次要结局为每次遭遇的费用。结果:共评估了110例独特患者中的119例主要支架置入程序; 73(GA)和46(LA)。两组之间的平均年龄或性别均无差异。 GA组和LA组在出现后的12小时内均被置入支架,分别为58%和54%(P = 0.69);两组从支架置入到结石清除的时间间隔相似(GA和LA组分别为33天和35天,P = .79)。没有发现在GA组和LA组之间放置支架失败的显着差异(分别为1.3%和8.7%,P = .07)。两组均未发生与支架置入相关的并发症。 Google Analytics(分析)小组中,每次遇到的平均费用几乎高出4倍。结论:在办公室的LA下可以安全有效地进行紧急输尿管支架置入术。尽管避免了遗传算法并降低了成本,但这种方法并没有延长确定石料管理的间隔时间。 ? 2013 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号