首页> 外文期刊>Corporate environmental strategy >Global Corporations and Human Rights: The Regulatory Debate in Australia
【24h】

Global Corporations and Human Rights: The Regulatory Debate in Australia

机译:全球公司与人权:澳大利亚的监管辩论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Public opinion surveys consistently show that the majority of people in many countries believe that corporations should abide by recognised standards in business ethics, human rights, labour practices and environmental impacts. Reliance on voluntary codes has not been effective. The debate is now moving towards the development of more effective regulatory frameworks. This article argues for a multi-layered regulatory approach at national and international levels, using examples from the debate in Australia over three issues: the 1998 draft Multilateral Agreement on Investment; the experience in Australia of international and company voluntary codes; and the debate over a national regulatory initiative (the Corporate Code of Conduct Bill) introduced into the Australian Commonwealth Parliament in 2000-2001.
机译:舆论调查始终表明,许多国家的大多数人认为公司应遵守商业道德,人权,劳工惯例和环境影响方面公认的标准。依靠自愿守则并没有奏效。辩论现在正朝着开发更有效的监管框架发展。本文以澳大利亚在三个问题上的辩论为例,主张在国家和国际层面采取多层监管方法:1998年《多边投资协定》草案;国际和公司自愿守则在澳大利亚的经验;以及在2000-2001年将有关国家监管举措(《企业行为守则法案》)引入澳大利亚联邦议会的辩论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号