...
首页> 外文期刊>Cornea >Estimation of the central corneal power in keratoconus: Theoretical and clinical assessment of the error of the keratometric approach
【24h】

Estimation of the central corneal power in keratoconus: Theoretical and clinical assessment of the error of the keratometric approach

机译:圆锥角膜中央角膜屈光力的估计:角膜曲率法误差的理论和临床评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

PURPOSE:: The aim of this study was to analyze theoretically the errors in the central corneal power calculation in eyes with keratoconus when a keratometric index (nk) is used and to clinically confirm the errors induced by this approach. METHODS:: Differences (ΔPc) between central corneal power estimation with the classical nk (Pk) and with the Gaussian equation ((Equation is included in full-text article.)) in eyes with keratoconus were simulated and evaluated theoretically, considering the potential range of variation of the central radius of curvature of the anterior (r1c) and posterior (r2c) corneal surfaces. Further, these differences were also studied in a clinical sample including 44 keratoconic eyes (27 patients, age range: 14-73 years). The clinical agreement between Pk and (Equation is included in full-text article.)(true net power) obtained with a Scheimpflug photography-based topographer was evaluated in such eyes. RESULTS:: For nk = 1.3375, an overestimation was observed in most cases in the theoretical simulations, with ΔPc ranging from an underestimation of -0.1 diopters (D) (r1c = 7.9 mm and r2c = 8.2 mm) to an overestimation of 4.3 D (r1c = 4.7 mm and r2c = 3.1 mm). Clinically, Pk always overestimated the (Equation is included in full-text article.)given by the topography system in a range between 0.5 and 2.5 D (P < 0.01). The mean clinical ΔPc was 1.48 D, with limits of agreement of 0.71 and 2.25 D. A very strong statistically significant correlation was found between ΔPc and r2c (r = -0.93, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS:: The use of a single value for nk for the calculation of corneal power is imprecise in keratoconus and can lead to significant clinical errors.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是从理论上分析使用角膜曲率指数(nk)的圆锥角膜眼中央角膜屈光度计算的误差,并在临床上确认这种方法引起的误差。方法:模拟和评估了圆锥角膜眼睛的中央角膜屈光度估​​计值与经典nk(Pk)和高斯方程(方程包含在全文中)之间的差异(ΔPc)。角膜前表面(r1c)和后角(r2c)的中心曲率半径的变化范围。此外,还在包括44个圆锥角膜眼(27例患者,年龄范围:14-73岁)的临床样本中研究了这些差异。在这样的眼睛中,评估了Pk与(基于等式的全文中包含的)(基于纯Scheimpflug摄影技术的地形图仪)获得的临床协议(真实净功率)。结果:对于nk = 1.3375,在大多数情况下,在理论模拟中观察到高估,ΔPc范围从-0.1屈光度(D)低估(r1c = 7.9 mm和r2c = 8.2 mm)到高估4.3 D (r1c = 4.7毫米,r2c = 3.1毫米)。在临床上,Pk总是高估了地形系统给出的0.5至2.5 D之间的范围(方程包括在全文中)(P <0.01)。临床平均ΔPc为1.48 D,一致极限为0.71和2.25D。ΔPc与r2c之间存在非常强的统计学显着相关性(r = -0.93,P <0.01)。结论:在圆锥角膜中使用nk的单个值来计算角膜屈光力是不精确的,并且可能导致重大的临床错误。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号