首页> 外文期刊>Creativity Research Journal >An Evaluation of Alternative Ways of Computing the Creativity Quotient in a Design School Sample
【24h】

An Evaluation of Alternative Ways of Computing the Creativity Quotient in a Design School Sample

机译:在设计学校样本中计算创造力商的替代方法的评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Certain educational programs and jobs require selecting individuals based on their creativity. Tests of creativity are commonly based on divergent thinking tasks. The scoring of the ideational output of such tasks should ideally be done based on fluency (the number of ideas generated), flexibility (the number of categories into which the generated ideas can be partitioned), and originality (the number of unique or unusual ideas). However, most scoring procedures do not take into account all three dimensions. Building on the Creativity Quotient (CQ) measure (Snyder, Mitchell, Bossomaier & Pallier, 2004), which covers fluency and flexibility, an adjusted CQ and two CQs based on diversity type measures are proposed. Findings indicated that an adjusted measure that weights categories based on their discriminative power was most strongly related to other predictors of performance on creative tasks and thus presents an important advance over the original CQ.
机译:某些教育计划和工作需要根据他们的创造力来选择个人。创造力的测试通常基于不同的思维任务。理想情况下,应基于流利性(生成的想法数量),灵活性(所生成的想法可以划分为多个类别的数量)和独创性(独特或不寻常想法的数量)对此类任务的想法输出进行评分)。但是,大多数计分程序并未考虑所有三个方面。在创造性智商(CQ)度量(Snyder,Mitchell,Bossomaier和Pallier,2004)的基础上,该度量涵盖了流畅性和灵活性,提出了一种调整后的CQ和两个基于多样性类型度量的CQ。结果表明,根据类别的判别力对类别进行加权的调整后的度量与其他创造性任务绩效的预测指标最密切相关,因此与原始CQ相比具有重要的进步。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号