...
首页> 外文期刊>Critical care medicine >Crystalloid or colloid fluid loading and pulmonary permeability, edema, and injury in septic and nonseptic critically ill patients with hypovolemia.
【24h】

Crystalloid or colloid fluid loading and pulmonary permeability, edema, and injury in septic and nonseptic critically ill patients with hypovolemia.

机译:脓毒症和非败血性重症低血容量患者的晶体或胶体液负荷以及肺通透性,水肿和损伤。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To compare crystalloid and colloid fluids in their effect on pulmonary edema in hypovolemic septic and nonseptic patients with or at risk for acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome. We hypothesized that 1) crystalloid loading results in more edema formation than colloid loading and 2) the differences among the types of fluid decreases at high permeability. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Prospective randomized clinical trial on the effect of fluids in 24 septic and 24 nonseptic mechanically ventilated patients with clinical hypovolemia. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were assigned to NaCl 0.9%, gelatin 4%, hydroxyethyl starch 6%, or albumin 5% loading for 90 minutes according to changes in filling pressures. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Twenty-three septic and 10 nonseptic patients had acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome (p < 0.001). Septic patients had greater pulmonary capillary permeability, edema, and severity of lung injury than nonseptic patients (p < 0.01), as measured by the pulmonary leak index (PLI) for Gallium-labeled transferrin, extravascular lung water (EVLW), and lung injury score (LIS), respectively. Colloids increased plasma volume, cardiac index, and central venous pressure (CVP) more than crystalloids (p < 0.05), although more crystalloids were infused (p < 0.05). Colloid osmotic pressure (COP) increased in colloid and decreased in crystalloid groups (p < 0.001). Irrespective of fluid type or underlying disease, the pulmonary leak index increased by median 5% (p < 0.05). Regardless of fluid type or underlying disease, EVLW and LIS did not change during fluid loading and EVLW related to COP-CVP (rs = -.40, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Pulmonary edema and LIS are not affected by the type of fluid loading in the steep part of the cardiac function curve in both septic and nonseptic patients. Then, pulmonary capillary permeability may be a smaller determinant of pulmonary edema than COP and CVP. Safety factors may have prevented edema during a small filtrationpressure-induced rise in pulmonary protein and thus fluid transport.
机译:目的:比较晶体和胶体液对患有或有急性肺损伤/急性呼吸窘迫综合征风险的低血容量败血症和非败血症患者的肺水肿的影响。我们假设1)晶体负载比胶体负载导致更多的水肿形成,以及2)高渗透率时流体类型之间的差异减小。设计,地点和患者:体液对24例败血症的机械通气患者和24例非败血症的机械通气患者的体液影响的前瞻性随机临床试验。干预措施:根据灌装压力的变化,将患者分装90分钟的NaCl 0.9%,明胶4%,羟乙基淀粉6%或白蛋白5%,持续90分钟。测量和主要结果:23例败血症和10例非败血症患者患有急性肺损伤/急性呼吸窘迫综合征(p <0.001)。脓毒症患者的肺毛细血管通透性,水肿和肺损伤的严重程度高于非脓毒症患者(p <0.01),这是通过镓标记的转铁蛋白,血管外肺水(EVLW)和肺损伤的肺漏指数(PLI)测得的分数(LIS)。胶体增加的血浆容量,心脏指数和中心静脉压(CVP)比晶体增加(p <0.05),尽管输注了更多的晶体(p <0.05)。胶体中的胶体渗透压(COP)增加,而晶体组中的胶体渗透压降低(p <0.001)。不论液体类型或潜在疾病如何,肺渗漏指数均增加了5%(p <0.05)。无论液体类型或潜在疾病如何,在液体负荷期间EVLW和LIS均没有改变,并且与COP-CVP相关的EVLW(rs = -.40,p <0.01)。结论在脓毒症和非脓毒症患者中,肺水肿和LIS不受心功能曲线陡峭部分的液体负荷类型的影响。然后,与COP和CVP相比,肺毛细血管通透性可能是决定肺水肿的较小因素。安全因素可能已防止在小滤过压力期间水肿引起的肺蛋白升高,从而阻止了液体的运输。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号