首页> 外文期刊>Critical care medicine >Rescue therapy by switching to total face mask after failure of face mask-delivered noninvasive ventilation in do-not-intubate patients in acute respiratory failure
【24h】

Rescue therapy by switching to total face mask after failure of face mask-delivered noninvasive ventilation in do-not-intubate patients in acute respiratory failure

机译:急性呼吸衰竭的非插管患者在面罩提供的无创通气失败后通过更换全罩来进行抢救治疗

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of switching to total face mask in cases where face mask-delivered noninvasive mechanical ventilation has already failed in do-not-intubate patients in acute respiratory failure. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective observational study in an ICU and a respiratory stepdown unit over a 12-month study period. INTERVENTION: Switching to total face mask, which covers the entire face, when noninvasive mechanical ventilation using facial mask (oronasal mask) failed to reverse acute respiratory failure. PATIENTS: Seventy-four patients with a do-not-intubate order and treated by noninvasive mechanical ventilation for acute respiratory failure. MAIN RESULTS: Failure of face mask-delivered noninvasive mechanical ventilation was associated with a three-fold increase in in-hospital mortality (36% vs. 10.5%; p = 0.009). Nevertheless, 23 out of 36 patients (64%) in whom face mask-delivered noninvasive mechanical ventilation failed to reverse acute respiratory failure and, therefore, switched to total face mask survived hospital discharge. Reasons for switching from facial mask to total face mask included refractory hypercapnic acute respiratory failure (n = 24, 66.7%), painful skin breakdown or facial mask intolerance (n = 11, 30%), and refractory hypoxemia (n = 1, 2.7%). In the 24 patients switched from facial mask to total face mask because of refractory hypercapnia, encephalopathy score (3 [3-4] vs. 2 [2-3]; p < 0.0001), PaCO2 (87 ± 25 mm Hg vs. 70 ± 17 mm Hg; p < 0.0001), and pH (7.24 ± 0.1 vs. 7.32 ± 0.09; p < 0.0001) significantly improved after 2 hrs of total face mask-delivered noninvasive ventilation. Patients switched early to total face mask (in the first 12 hrs) developed less pressure sores (n = 5, 24% vs. n = 13, 87%; p = 0.0002), despite greater length of noninvasive mechanical ventilation within the first 48 hrs (44 hrs vs. 34 hrs; p = 0.05) and less protective dressings (n = 2, 9.5% vs. n = 8, 53.3%; p = 0.007). The optimal cutoff value for face mask-delivered noninvasive mechanical ventilation duration in predicting facial pressure sores was 11 hrs (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.86 ± 0.04; 95% confidence interval 0.76-0.93; p < 0.0001; sensitivity, 84%; specificity, 71%). CONCLUSION: In patients in hypercapnic acute respiratory failure, for whom escalation to intubation is deemed inappropriate, switching to total face mask can be proposed as a last resort therapy when face mask-delivered noninvasive mechanical ventilation has already failed to reverse acute respiratory failure. This strategy is particularly adapted to provide prolonged periods of continuous noninvasive mechanical ventilation while preventing facial pressure sores.
机译:目的:在急性呼吸衰竭的非插管患者中,评估在使用面罩提供的无创机械通气已经失败的情况下,改用全脸罩的影响。设计与设置:在为期12个月的研究期内,在ICU和呼吸降压装置中进行前瞻性观察研究。干预:当使用面罩(口鼻罩)的无创机械通气未能扭转急性呼吸衰竭时,请切换至覆盖整个脸部的全脸罩。患者:74例患者,请勿插管,并通过无创机械通气治疗急性呼吸衰竭。主要结果:面罩交付的无创机械通气失败与住院死亡率增加了三倍有关(36%比10.5%; p = 0.009)。然而,在36例患者中,有23例(64%)进行了面罩无创机械通气,未能逆转急性呼吸衰竭,因此,在出院后转为使用全面罩。从面罩更换为全面罩的原因包括难治性高碳酸血症性急性呼吸衰竭(n = 24,66.7%),痛苦的皮肤破裂或面膜不耐受(n = 11,30%)和难治性低氧血症(n = 1,2.7 %)。在24例因难治性高碳酸血症而从面罩转为全面罩的患者中,脑病评分(3 [3-4] vs. 2 [2-3]; p <0.0001),PaCO2(87±25 mm Hg vs. 70)在全口罩无创通气2小时后,pH值(±17 mm Hg; p <0.0001)和pH值(7.24±0.1 vs. 7.32±0.09; p <0.0001)显着改善。尽管在开始的48天内无创机械通气时间较长,但患者尽早更换为全口罩(在最初的12小时内)出现的褥疮较少(n = 5,24%vs. n = 13,87%; p = 0.0002)。小时(44小时vs. 34小时; p = 0.05)和更少的防护敷料(n = 2,9.5%vs. n = 8,53.3%; p = 0.007)。面罩输送的无创机械通气持续时间在预测面部压疮时的最佳临界值为11小时(受试者工作特征曲线下的面积为0.86±0.04; 95%的置信区间为0.76-0.93; p <0.0001;灵敏度为84% ;特异性为71%)。结论:对于高碳酸血症性急性呼吸衰竭的患者,认为升级为插管是不适当的,当面罩提供的无创机械通气已经无法逆转急性呼吸衰竭时,建议改用全脸罩作为最后的治疗方法。该策略特别适合于提供长时间的连续无创机械通气,同时防止面部压疮。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号