首页> 外文期刊>Critical care medicine >Risk factors for albicans and non-albicans candidemia in the intensive care unit.
【24h】

Risk factors for albicans and non-albicans candidemia in the intensive care unit.

机译:重症监护病房白化病和非白化病念珠菌血症的危险因素。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To determine risk factors for bloodstream infections (BSI) with Candida non-albicans (C-NA) species and Candida albicans (CA) among critically ill patients. DESIGN: Case-control study. SETTING: Adult medical and surgical intensive care units (ICUs) at two university hospitals. PATIENTS: Consecutive patients with C-NA and CA BSIs from 1995-2005 formed the two case groups. Controls were patients without candidemia who were randomly selected in a ratio of 5:1 and matched by study hospital, ICU type (medical vs. surgical) and by ICU admission date within a 3-month period. INTERVENTIONS: Data collected included demographics, comorbidities, exposure to antibiotics and antifungals, and ICU factors such as total parenteral nutrition (TPN), blood product transfusions, invasive procedures, central venous catheters, hemodialysis, and mechanical ventilation. We built multivariable logistic regression models, which identified risk factors for C-NA or CA BSIs compared with controls. Variables were adjusted for time-at-risk. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: There were 67 patients with C-NA BSIs, 79 patients with CA BSIs, and 780 controls. In multivariable models, factors associated with an increased risk of C-NA compared with controls included major pre-ICU operations [odds ratio; (95% confidence interval)] [2.12; (1.14-3.97)], gastrointestinal procedures [2.24; (1.49-3.38)], enteric bacteremia [3.43; (1.39-8.48)], number of hemodialysis days [6.20; (2.67-14.4)], TPN duration [2.87; (1.40-5.90)], and mean number of red blood cell transfusions [2.72; (1.33-5.58)]. Factors associated with an increased risk of CA BSIs compared to controls were very similar and included major ICU operations [1.26; (1.14-3.97)], enteric bacteremia [3.45; (1.38-8.63)], number of hemodialysis days [3.84; (1.75-8.40)], TPN duration [11.0; (5.52-21.7)] and mean number of red blood cell transfusions [1.97; (0.98-3.99)]. CONCLUSIONS: We found multiple common risk factors for both non-C. albicans and C. albicans BSIs, however we could not differentiate between these two groups based on clinical characteristics alone.
机译:目的:确定危重患者中非白色念珠菌(C-NA)和白色念珠菌(CA)血流感染(BSI)的危险因素。设计:病例对照研究。地点:两家大学医院的成人医疗和外科重症监护病房(ICU)。患者:1995-2005年连续的C-NA和CA BSI患者组成了两个病例组。对照组为无念珠菌血症的患者,他们按5:1的比例随机选择,并根据研究医院,ICU类型(医疗与手术)和3个月内的ICU入院日期进行匹配。干预措施:收集的数据包括人口统计学,合并症,抗生素和抗真菌药的暴露以及ICU因素,例如全胃肠外营养(TPN),输血,侵入性手术,中心静脉导管,血液透析和机械通气。我们建立了多变量logistic回归模型,该模型确定了C-NA或CA BSI与对照组相比的危险因素。调整了风险时间变量。测量和主要结果:C-NA BSI患者67例,CA BSI患者79例,对照组780例。在多变量模型中,与对照组相比,与C-NA风险增加相关的因素包括ICU之前的主要手术[比值比; (95%置信区间)] [2.12; (1.14-3.97)],胃肠道手术[2.24; (1.49-3.38)],肠菌血症[3.43; (1.39-8.48)],血液透析天数[6.20; (2.67-14.4)],TPN持续时间[2.87; (1.40-5.90)],以及平均红细胞输血次数[2.72; (1.33-5.58)]。与对照组相比,与CA BSI风险增加相关的因素非常相似,包括ICU的主要操作[1.26; (1.14-3.97)],肠菌血症[3.45; (1.38-8.63)],血液透析天数[3.84; (1.75-8.40)],TPN持续时间[11.0; (5.52-21.7)]和平均红细胞输注次数[1.97; (0.98-3.99)]。结论:我们发现非C的多个常见危险因素。白色念珠菌和白色念珠菌BSI,但是我们不能仅根据临床特征就将这两个群体区分开。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号