...
首页> 外文期刊>Critical care medicine >Recommendations for the diagnosis and management of corticosteroid insufficiency in critically ill adult patients: consensus statements from an international task force by the American College of Critical Care Medicine.
【24h】

Recommendations for the diagnosis and management of corticosteroid insufficiency in critically ill adult patients: consensus statements from an international task force by the American College of Critical Care Medicine.

机译:对重症成年患者皮质类固醇不足的诊断和治疗建议:美国重症医学学院国际工作组的共识声明。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To develop consensus statements for the diagnosis and management of corticosteroid insufficiency in critically ill adult patients. PARTICIPANTS: A multidisciplinary, multispecialty task force of experts in critical care medicine was convened from the membership of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. In addition, international experts in endocrinology were invited to participate. DESIGN/METHODS: The task force members reviewed published literature and provided expert opinion from which the consensus was derived. The consensus statements were developed using a modified Delphi methodology. The strength of each recommendation was quantified using the Modified GRADE system, which classifies recommendations as strong (grade 1) or weak (grade 2) and the quality of evidence as high (grade A), moderate (grade B), or low (grade C) based on factors that include the study design, the consistency of the results, and the directness of the evidence. RESULTS: The task force coined the term critical illness-related corticosteroid insufficiency to describe the dysfunction of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis that occurs during critical illness. Critical illness-related corticosteroid insufficiency is caused by adrenal insufficiency together with tissue corticosteroid resistance and is characterized by an exaggerated and protracted proinflammatory response. Critical illness-related corticosteroid insufficiency should be suspected in hypotensive patients who have responded poorly to fluids and vasopressor agents, particularly in the setting of sepsis. At this time, the diagnosis of tissue corticosteroid resistance remains problematic. Adrenal insufficiency in critically ill patients is best made by a delta total serum cortisol of < 9 microg/dL after adrenocorticotrophic hormone (250 microg) administration or a random total cortisol of < 10 microg/dL. The benefit of treatment with glucocorticoids at this time seems to be limited to patients with vasopressor-dependent septic shock and patients with early severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (PaO2/FiO2 of < 200 and within 14 days of onset). The adrenocorticotrophic hormone stimulation test should not be used to identify those patients with septic shock or acute respiratory distress syndrome who should receive glucocorticoids. Hydrocortisone in a dose of 200 mg/day in four divided doses or as a continuous infusion in a dose of 240 mg/day (10 mg/hr) for > or = 7 days is recommended for septic shock. Methylprednisolone in a dose of 1 mg x kg(-1) x day(-1) for > or = 14 days is recommended in patients with severe early acute respiratory distress syndrome. Glucocorticoids should be weaned and not stopped abruptly. Reinstitution of treatment should be considered with recurrence of signs of sepsis, hypotension, or worsening oxygenation. Dexamethasone is not recommended to treat critical illness-related corticosteroid insufficiency. The role of glucocorticoids in the management of patients with community-acquired pneumonia, liver failure, pancreatitis, those undergoing cardiac surgery, and other groups of critically ill patients requires further investigation. CONCLUSION: Evidence-linked consensus statements with regard to the diagnosis and management of corticosteroid deficiency in critically ill patients have been developed by a multidisciplinary, multispecialty task force.
机译:目的:为重症成年患者制定诊断和治疗皮质类固醇不足的共识性声明。参与者:重症医学专家和欧洲重症监护医学学会的成员召集了一个多学科,多专业的重症医学专家工作组。此外,国际内分泌专家也应邀参加。设计/方法:工作组成员审查了已发表的文献并提供了得出共识的专家意见。共识声明是使用改进的Delphi方法开发的。每个建议的强度均使用Modified GRADE系统进行了量化,该系统将建议分为强(1级)或弱(2级),证据质量分为高(A级),中(B级)或低(等级) C)基于包括研究设计,结果的一致性和证据的直接性在内的因素。结果:工作队创造了术语“与危重病有关的皮质类固醇激素不足”来描述危重病期间发生的下丘脑-垂体-肾上腺轴功能障碍。严重疾病相关的皮质类固醇激素不足是由肾上腺功能不全以及组织中的皮质类固醇耐药性引起的,其特征是炎症反应过度和持久。在对液体和血管升压药反应不良的低血压患者中,尤其是在败血症的情况下,应怀疑与疾病有关的皮质类固醇激素不足。此时,组织糖皮质激素抵抗的诊断仍然存在问题。重症患者的肾上腺功能不全最好由肾上腺皮质营养激素(250 microg)给药后血清总皮质醇<9 microg / dL或随机总皮质醇<10 microg / dL造成。此时,糖皮质激素治疗的益处似乎仅限于血管升压药依赖性败血性休克和早期严重急性呼吸窘迫综合征(PaO2 / FiO2 <200且在发病后14天内)的患者。不应使用肾上腺皮质营养激素刺激试验来鉴定那些应该接受糖皮质激素治疗的感染性休克或急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者。对于败血性休克,推荐氢化可的松以200毫克/天的剂量分四次服用,或以240毫克/天(10毫克/小时)的剂量连续输注>或= 7天。对于患有严重的早期急性呼吸窘迫综合征的患者,建议以1 mg x kg(-1)x天(-1)的剂量大于或等于14天服用甲泼尼龙。糖皮质激素应断奶,不要突然停药。重新考虑出现败血症,低血压或氧合恶化迹象时应考虑恢复治疗。不建议使用地塞米松治疗与疾病相关的严重皮质类固醇激素不足。糖皮质激素在社区获得性肺炎,肝衰竭,胰腺炎,进行心脏手术的患者以及其他危重患者组的治疗中的作用尚需进一步研究。结论:多学科,多专业的工作组已经制定了关于危重病患者皮质类固醇缺乏症的诊断和治疗的循证共识声明。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号