【24h】

In reply to Drs Bowes and Crook

机译:回复鲍斯博士和克鲁克博士

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

To the Editor: We appreciate this opportunity to respond to Drs Bowes and Crook.The first paragraph of the Bowes and Crook (B&C) response to our editorial (1) on dose escalation and prostate cancer is notable in that it says nothing about dose escalation. However, it contains questionable statements that deserve clarification.First, the Albertsen et al report of 2005 (2) correlates disease-specific mortality (DSM) with age, Gleason score, and time post-diagnosis (Table 1). These data do not suggest that DSM "is rare within 5-10 years of diagnosis" or that "the death toll is inexorable" beyond this time.
机译:致编辑:我们感谢有机会回应Bowes and Crook博士.Bowes and Crook(B&C)对我们关于社论中剂量增加和前列腺癌的回应(B)的第一段值得注意,因为它没有提到剂量增加。然而,它包含有疑问的陈述值得澄清。首先,Albertsen等人在2005年的报告(2)将疾病特异性死亡率(DSM)与年龄,格里森评分和诊断后时间相关(表1)。这些数据并不表明帝斯曼“在诊断后的5-10年内很少见”或“死亡人数不可逾越”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号