首页> 外文期刊>Acta Horticulturae >Effect of mechanized (automotive or shaker) vs. hand harvest on postharvest fruit quality of blueberries (Vaccinium corymbosum L.).
【24h】

Effect of mechanized (automotive or shaker) vs. hand harvest on postharvest fruit quality of blueberries (Vaccinium corymbosum L.).

机译:机械化(汽车或振动台)vs。手动收获对蓝莓(越桔越桔)收获后果实品质的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This research was carried out during the 2010/11 growing season to establish the effect of different types and times of harvest on the quality of fresh blueberries. The 6 treatments consisted of 3 harvest types (hand, automotive or shaker) and two harvest times (morning: 9-11 am; afternoon: 3-5 pm). Ten-year-old 'Brigitta' and 'O'Neal' plants, from a commercial planting in Linares (35 degrees 52' South and 71 degrees 37' West) were used. Measurements were made of: harvest duration, weight of fruit picked, and proportion, in weight, of fruit in the categories: fresh, discarded, IQF (individual quick frozen) and pre-size. Firmness was measured at harvest, and after 60 d at 0 degrees C plus 1 d at 18 degrees C (60+1). Mechanical damage was measured after 60+3 d. Highest fruit firmness, independent of cultivar and harvest type, was for am pickings. Firmness for both measuring dates and cultivars was lowest for automotive; while in 'O'Neal', hand and shaker had equivalent firmness, in 'Brigitta' shaker-harvested-fruit had intermediate firmness. Mechanical damage was greater for fruit picked with automotive equipment, and also in am pickings. Fruit picked by hand and with shaker had similar mechanical damage in 'Brigitta', but not in 'O'Neal', where shaking caused greater damage. After fruit sorting, 'Brigitta' had a greater proportion of fruit suitable for the fresh market. Averaging both cultivars, the proportion of fruit for the fresh market was 71.9, 76, and 82.9%, for automotive, shaker and hand harvest, respectively. These results indicate a positive potential for harvesting with shakers, but its effects on different cultivars and the cost/benefit ratio need to be studied.
机译:这项研究是在2010/11生长季节进行的,目的是确定不同类型和收获时间对新鲜蓝莓质量的影响。这6种处理方法包括3种收获类型(手动,自动或振动台)和两次收获时间(早晨:9-11点;下午:3-5点)。使用了来自利纳雷斯(Linares)的商业种植的10年龄“ Brigitta”和“ O'Neal”植物(南35度,西71度37度)。进行以下测量:收获持续时间,采摘的水果重量以及水果的重量比例,这些类别包括:新鲜,丢弃,IQF(单个速冻)和预先定型。在收获时以及在0摄氏度60天后在18摄氏度(60 + 1)下1天后测量硬度。在60 + 3 d后测量机械损伤。不受果树品种和收获类型的影响,最高硬度是用于采摘。测量日期和品种的硬度在汽车中最低;在'O'Neal'中,手和振动筛具有相同的硬度,在'Brigitta'中,振动筛收获的水果具有中等硬度。用汽车设备采摘的水果以及采摘时的机械损伤更大。用手和摇床采摘的水果在“ Brigitta”中具有相似的机械损伤,而在“ O'Neal”中则没有,机械振动造成的损伤更大。经过水果分选后,“ Brigitta”具有更大比例的适合新鲜市场的水果。平均两个品种,新鲜水果在汽车,振动筛和手动收获机上的比例分别为71.9%,76%和82.9%。这些结果表明用振动筛进行收割具有积极的潜力,但需要研究其对不同品种的影响以及成本/收益比。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号