首页> 外文期刊>Acta Horticulturae >Comparison in quality characters of five different tomato cultivars.
【24h】

Comparison in quality characters of five different tomato cultivars.

机译:五个不同番茄品种的品质性状比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Five different tomato cultivars ‘Holland belly’, ‘Jiafen No.15’, ‘Big yellow fruit 04-65’, ‘Jingdan No.1’ and ‘Jinzhu’ were selected to detect their quality characteristics. The physical and chemical quality of pre type of tomato fruits including contents of soluble solid, titratable acidity, sugar/acid ratio, vitamin C (Vc), lycopene, amino acid, color, and firmness were all measured, and the sensory analysis was also evaluated. The order of sensory analysis evaluation was ‘Jingdan No.1’ > ‘Jinzhu’ > ‘Jiafen No.15’ > ‘Big yellow fruit 04-65’ > ‘Holland belly’. The correlation between sensory evaluation results and measured quality indexes was analyzed. Based on correlation analysis results, quality indexes of tomato fruits were graded, and grading standards were established. Comprehensive flavor quality of pre type of fruits could be measured by summing up all the grades of quality indexes. In this way, the comprehensive evaluating index of ‘Jingdan No.1’ was the highest, the value was 31.09, which means the best flavor tomato fruit; ‘Holland belly’ gained the lowest comprehensive evaluating index (8.82) among the five cultivars. The method of comprehensive evaluation for flavor quality could be applied in evaluation of tomato fruit’s quality.
机译:选择了五个不同的番茄品种“荷兰肚”,“嘉芬15号”,“大黄果04-65”,“金丹1号”和“金竹”以检测其品质特征。测量了番茄预水果的理化性质,包括可溶性固形物含量,可滴定的酸度,糖/酸比,维生素C(Vc),番茄红素,氨基酸,颜色和硬度,并进行了感官分析。评估。感官分析评估的顺序为“金丹1号”>“金竹”>“嘉芬15号”>“大黄果04-65”>“荷兰肚皮”。分析了感官评估结果与测量质量指标之间的相关性。根据相关分析结果,对番茄果实的质量指标进行分级,并建立了分级标准。可以通过汇总所有等级的质量指标来测量预水果的综合风味质量。这样,“金丹一号”的综合评价指数最高,为31.09,说明番茄果香最好。 “荷兰肚”在五个品种中获得最低的综合评价指数(8.82)。风味品质的综合评价方法可以应用于番茄果实品质的评价。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号