...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical microbiology and infection: European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases >Comparison of the Becton Dickinson strand displacement amplification and Cobas Amplicor Roche PCR for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis: pooling versus individual tests.
【24h】

Comparison of the Becton Dickinson strand displacement amplification and Cobas Amplicor Roche PCR for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis: pooling versus individual tests.

机译:Becton Dickinson链置换扩增和Cobas Amplicor Roche PCR检测沙眼衣原体的比较:合并测试与单独测试。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The objective of the study was to examine the influence of pooling Chlamydia trachomatis specimens. We compared Becton Dickinson ProbeTec strand displacement amplification (SDA) with Cobas Amplicor Roche (PCR). With PCR as the standard, SDA performed equally well in single-sample testing. For pooled PCR samples (compared to individual PCR), we found a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 98.9%. For pooled SDA tests (compared to individual SDA), we found a sensitivity of 86.5% and a specificity of 98.9%. Our conclusion is that 2-sucrose phosphate buffer (2-SP) can be used for individual SDA testing. A reduced sensitivity was found for pooled SDA samples, and we cannot recommend that SDA be used for pooling with 2-SP. Further pooling studies with other transport media are warranted.
机译:该研究的目的是检查合并沙眼衣原体标本的影响。我们比较了Becton Dickinson ProbeTec链置换扩增(SDA)和Cobas Amplicor Roche(PCR)。以PCR为标准,SDA在单样品测试中表现同样出色。对于合并的PCR样品(与单个PCR相比),我们发现灵敏度为100%,特异性为98.9%。对于合并的SDA测试(与单个SDA相比),我们发现灵敏度为86.5%,特异性为98.9%。我们的结论是2-蔗糖磷酸缓冲液(2-SP)可用于单独的SDA测试。对于合并的SDA样品发现灵敏度降低,我们不建议将SDA与2-SP合并使用。有必要与其他运输媒介进行进一步的汇总研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号