首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Comparison of manual Amplicor PCR Cobas Amplicor PCR and LCx assays for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women by using urine specimens.
【2h】

Comparison of manual Amplicor PCR Cobas Amplicor PCR and LCx assays for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women by using urine specimens.

机译:手动Amplicor PCRCobas Amplicor PCR和LCx检测通过使用尿液标本检测女性沙眼衣原体感染的比较。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We compared the Roche Amplicor PCR, Roche Cobas Amplicor PCR, and Abbott LCx assays by using urine specimens for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infections in a female population. First-catch urine and endocervical swab specimens were collected from a total of 442 patients. Urine specimens were tested by the manual Roche Amplicor PCR, the automatic Roche Cobas Amplicor PCR, and the Abbott LCx assays as instructed by the manufacturers. For the Cobas Amplicor PCR, the internal control protocol was used for every specimen to reveal the presence of polymerase inhibitors. Cell culture of cervical specimens was used as a reference method. Of 442 patients, 50 (11.3%) were confirmed to have chlamydial infection. The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of cell culture with cervical swab specimens were 88 and 100%, respectively. With urine specimens the sensitivity and specificity for the manual Amplicor PCR assay were 100 and 99.7%, respectively; those for the automatic Cobas Amplicor PCR assay were 94 and 99.2%, respectively; and those for the LCx assay were 94 and 100%, respectively. Thus, all amplification methods with urine specimens proved to be highly sensitive and specific for the detection of C. trachomatis infection in women. No statistically significant differences in the test performances could be demonstrated for specimens from this population. All three amplification techniques with urine specimens proved to be superior to cell culture with cervical swab specimens in diagnosing C. trachomatis infections in women.
机译:我们比较了罗氏Amplicor PCR,罗氏Cobas Amplicor PCR和Abbott LCx分析法,通过使用尿液标本检测女性人群中的沙眼衣原体感染。从总共442例患者中收集了首发尿液和宫颈拭子标本。按照制造商的指示,通过手动Roche Amplicor PCR,自动Roche Cobas Amplicor PCR和Abbott LCx测定法检测尿液样本。对于Cobas Amplicor PCR,每个样品均使用内部对照方案以揭示聚合酶抑制剂的存在。宫颈标本的细胞培养用作参考方法。在442名患者中,有50名(11.3%)被确认患有衣原体感染。宫颈拭子标本细胞培养的诊断敏感性和特异性分别为88%和100%。对于尿液标本,手动Amplicor PCR检测的灵敏度和特异性分别为100和99.7%。自动Cobas Amplicor PCR检测的分别为94%和99.2%; LCx分析的分别为94%和100%。因此,所有使用尿液样本的扩增方法均被证明对检测女性沙眼衣原体感染具有高度的敏感性和特异性。对于该人群的标本,在测试性能上没有统计学上的显着差异。在诊断女性沙眼衣原体感染中,尿液标本的所有三种扩增技术均被证明优于宫颈拭子标本的细胞培养。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号