首页> 外文期刊>Biochemistry >van't Hoff and Calorimetric Enthalpier from Isothermal Titration Calorimetry:Are There Significant Discrepancies?
【24h】

van't Hoff and Calorimetric Enthalpier from Isothermal Titration Calorimetry:Are There Significant Discrepancies?

机译:等温滴定量热法中的Hoff和量热焓:没有显着差异吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The enthalpy of a reaction is most often determined through one of two means; it can be determined directly using calorimetry or indirectly by measuring the temperature dependence of the equilibrium constant (i.e., the van’t Hoff method). Recently, discrepancies have been noted between the enthalpy measured by calorimetry, AH~1, and the enthalpy determined by the van’t Hoff method, AH~H. This has been suggested to indicate that the binding reaction is more complex than the simple one-to-one binding model used to describe the data. To better understand possible discrepancies between AH~1 and AH~H, we have undertaken both experimental studies using isothermal titration calorimetry to measure the binding energetics of Ba2~ binding 18-crown-6 ether and 2’-CMP binding RNase A, along with a simulation of a system involving a molecule in conformational equilibrium coupled with binding. We find that when experimental setup and analysis are correctly performed, no statistically significant discrepancies between AH~J and AH~H exist even for the linked system.
机译:反应的焓通常通过以下两种方法之一确定:可以直接使用量热法确定,也可以通过测量平衡常数的温度依赖性(即van’t Hoff方法)间接确定。最近,已经注意到通过量热法测量的焓AH〜1与通过van’t Hoff方法确定的焓AH〜H之间存在差异。已经表明这表明结合反应比用于描述数据的简单的一对一结合模型更为复杂。为了更好地了解AH〜1和AH〜H之间可能存在的差异,我们进行了两项实验研究,即使用等温滴定量热法来测量Ba2〜结合18-冠-6醚和2'-CMP结合RNase A的结合能,以及对包含构象平衡分子并结合的分子的系统的模拟。我们发现,正确执行实验设置和分析后,即使对于链接的系统,AH〜J和AH〜H之间也没有统计学上的显着差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号