首页> 外文期刊>Clinical and experimental dermatology >Comparison of potassium titanyl phosphate vascular laser and hyfrecator in the treatment of vascular spiders and cherry angiomas.
【24h】

Comparison of potassium titanyl phosphate vascular laser and hyfrecator in the treatment of vascular spiders and cherry angiomas.

机译:钛氧钛磷酸钾血管激光治疗仪和hyfrecator治疗血管蜘蛛和樱桃血管瘤的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Patients with vascular spiders and angiomas, especially on exposed sites, demonstrate considerable psychological morbidity and therefore request treatment. Traditionally, electrosurgical modalities have been used to treat such lesions, but more recently lasers have been introduced. This open study assesses the efficacy of these two treatment modalities, scoring patients' preference and psychological morbidity before and after treatment. All patients had two vascular spiders or angiomas. One lesion was randomized for treatment with the hyfrecator, whilst the other lesion was treated with the potassium titanyl phosphate (KTP) vascular laser. The end-point of the study was either clearance of lesions or a maximum of three treatments at 2-month intervals. In this first comparative study, we demonstrate that both therapeutic modalities were effective in treating these lesions and in significantly reducing the post-treatment psychological morbidity score. However, on average, only one treatment with the KTP laser was required to achieve clearance compared with two treatments with the hyfrecator. This would result in less clinic visits. In addition, patients favoured the KTP laser because of the lack of side-effects. Both the KTP vascular laser and the hyfrecator were able to clear vascular spiders and angiomas, but the KTP laser was superior as fewer treatment episodes were required and patients preferred this treatment modality because of the lack of side-effects.
机译:患有血管蜘蛛和血管瘤的患者,尤其是在裸露的部位,表现出相当大的心理疾病,因此需要治疗。传统上,电外科方式已用于治疗此类病变,但最近已引入激光。这项开放性研究评估了这两种治疗方式的疗效,对患者的偏爱和治疗前后的心理疾病进行评分。所有患者均患有两个血管蜘蛛或血管瘤。将一个病灶随机分配至高压灭菌器治疗,而另一个病灶则通过磷酸钛氧钾(KTP)血管激光治疗。研究的终点是清除病灶或每两个月间隔最多进行三种治疗。在这项第一项比较研究中,我们证明了两种治疗方式均能有效治疗这些病变并显着降低治疗后的心理发病率评分。但是,平均而言,与使用加湿器的两次处理相比,仅需使用KTP激光进行一次处理即可达到清除效果。这将减少门诊次数。另外,由于没有副作用,患者偏爱KTP激光。 KTP血管激光和除湿器均能够清除血管蜘蛛和血管瘤,但是KTP激光具有优越性,因为所需的治疗次数更少,并且由于缺乏副作用,患者更喜欢这种治疗方式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号