首页> 外文期刊>Clinica chimica acta: International journal of clinical chemistry and applied molecular biology >Allergen-specific IgE measurement with the IMMULITE 2000 system: intermethod comparison of detection performance for allergen-specific IgE antibodies from Korean allergic patients.
【24h】

Allergen-specific IgE measurement with the IMMULITE 2000 system: intermethod comparison of detection performance for allergen-specific IgE antibodies from Korean allergic patients.

机译:使用IMMULITE 2000系统测量变应原特异性IgE:韩国过敏患者变应原特异性IgE抗体检测性能的方法间比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Intermethod comparison between IMMULITE 2000 chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay (CLEIA) and the established CAP test for allergen-specific IgE (sIgE) has only been evaluated by a few studies. METHODS: We performed such an interassay comparison using 283 Korean allergic patients with the following: asthma (18.4%), allergic rhinitis (18.4%), both asthma and allergic rhinitis (14.5%), atopic dermatitis (21.9%), and others (26.8%). We compared the sIgE detection performance of both systems for 10 major inhalant allergens (Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus, Dermatophagoides farinae, Blattela germanica, cat dander, dog hair, alder, birch, oak, ragweed, and mugwort) and four food allergens (egg white, cow milk, peanut, and shrimp). RESULTS: After 645 paired comparison tests, close association and significant correlation were observed between the results of both assays for most of these allergens (r=0.525-0.979, p<0.05, respectively), except for shrimp. Intermethod agreement based on sIgE detection was fair to good (74.1-100%, kappa=0.514-1.000, p<0.05, respectively) for most allergens except for B. germanica, ragweed, and shrimp. Although both assays showed good accuracy in ROC curve analysis, some minor differences were noted. CONCLUSIONS: IMMULITE 2000 CLEIA for sIgE detection showed fair to good intermethod correlation, association, agreement, and accuracy in comparison to the established CAP assay among Korean allergic patients. However, we should take into account the intermethod differences between both assays for clinical applications.
机译:背景:IMMULITE 2000化学发光酶免疫测定(CLEIA)与已建立的针对过敏原特异性IgE(sIgE)的CAP测试之间的方法比较仅通过一些研究进行了评估。方法:我们对283例以下的韩国过敏性患者进行了测定间比较:哮喘(18.4%),过敏性鼻炎(18.4%),哮喘和过敏性鼻炎(14.5%),特应性皮炎(21.9%)以及其他( 26.8%)。我们比较了两种系统对10种主要吸入性过敏原(Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus,Dermatophagoides farinae,Blattela germanica,猫皮屑,狗毛,al木,桦木,橡树,豚草和艾蒿)和四种食物过敏原(例如白,牛)的sIgE检测性能牛奶,花生和虾)。结果:经过645次配对比较测试后,除虾以外,大多数这些过敏原(r分别为r = 0.525-0.979,p <0.05)的两种测定结果之间均观察到密切相关和显着相关。除德国双歧杆菌,豚草和虾以外,对于大多数过敏原,基于sIgE检测的方法间一致性均良好(分别为74.1-100%,kappa = 0.514-1.000,p <0.05)。尽管两种测定在ROC曲线分析中均显示出良好的准确性,但仍注意到一些细微的差异。结论:与韩国过敏患者中建立的CAP检测相比,用于sIgE检测的IMMULITE 2000 CLEIA显示出公平到良好的方法间相关性,关联性,一致性和准确性。但是,对于临床应用,我们应考虑两种检测方法之间的方法差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号