...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical and experimental rheumatology >Guidelines for clinical studies assessing the efficacy of drugs for the management of acute low back pain.
【24h】

Guidelines for clinical studies assessing the efficacy of drugs for the management of acute low back pain.

机译:评估药物治疗急性下腰痛的疗效的临床研究指南。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In this paper we propose guidelines for clinical trials aimed at assessing the efficacy of drugs for acute non-specific low back pain (LBP) with or without radicular pain, preliminary to their approval and registration. To this end, consensus statements were obtained from a group of experts in the fields of rheumatology, clinical medicine, public health and epidemiology. EBM resources were systematically used as references. Four diagnostic categories were defined: type 1--LBP with no radiation; type 2--LBP radiating no further than the knee; type 3--LBP radiating beyond the knee, but with no neurologic signs; and type 4--LBP radiating to a specific and entire leg dermatome, with or without neurologic signs. Studies should be designed on the basis of the claimed indications for the drug, but must be double-blinded whatever the indication. The duration of the study may be shorter for LBP type 1 or 2 (one week) than for LBP types 3 and 4 (up to one month), depending on the aim of the study and the indications for the drug. The comparator may be inactive (placebo) or active (for a superiority trial, e.g., versus paracetamol). Specific inclusion and exclusion criteria have been defined here for each category. An appropriate wash-out period for any drugs that could affect the pain status should be planned. Paracetamol may be allowed as rescue medication. The primary endpoint should be based on a validated pain assessment tool that may be either generic (type 1 or 2) or oriented (back and knee for types 3 and 4). Secondary endpoints could include the assessment of functional performance; the duration of any period of bed-rest; work limitation; a global assessment comprising pain at rest, standing and walking; the time elapsed before epidural injection, the prescription of other therapeutic agents, or surgery; and the use of rescue medication. Adverse events (AE) should be monitored systematically using a methodology that reflects the mode of action of the tested drug. With the application of these guidelines, LBP could serve as an appropriate disease for testing analgesic drugs. Rigorous evaluation may also help to improve the management of acute LBP.
机译:在本文中,我们提出了临床试验指南,旨在评估批准或注册药物对有或无根性疼痛的急性非特异性下背痛(LBP)的疗效。为此,从风湿病学,临床医学,公共卫生和流行病学领域的专家组获得了共识声明。 EBM资源被系统地用作参考。定义了四个诊断类别:1型-LBP,无辐射; 3型,无辐射。 2-LBP辐射到膝盖以下; 3-LBP辐射到膝盖以外,但没有神经系统症状;和4-LBP型辐射到特定和整个腿部的皮肤刀,有无神经症状。研究应根据所声称的药物适应症进行设计,但无论适应症如何,都必须进行双盲研究。根据研究的目的和药物的适应症,LBP 1型或2型(一周)的研究持续时间可能比LBP 3型和4型(长达一个月)的研究持续时间短。比较器可能是无效的(安慰剂)或有效的(对于优越性试验,例如,与扑热息痛比较)。这里已经为每个类别定义了特定的包含和排除标准。应该计划任何可能影响疼痛状态的药物的适当冲洗期。扑热息痛可以作为急救药物使用。主要终点应基于经过验证的疼痛评估工具,该工具可以是通用的(1型或2型),也可以是定向的(3型和4型的背部和膝盖)。次要终点可以包括功能绩效评估;任何卧床休息时间;工作限制;全球评估,包括休息,站立和行走时的疼痛;硬膜外注射,其他治疗药物的处方或手术之前经过的时间;以及使用急救药物。不良事件(AE)应使用反映被测药物作用方式的方法进行系统监测。通过应用这些指南,LBP可以作为测试止痛药的合适疾病。严格的评估也可能有助于改善急性LBP的管理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号