首页> 外文期刊>Clinical and experimental ophthalmology >Stenting eyes: The pressure to perform
【24h】

Stenting eyes: The pressure to perform

机译:拉开眼睛:执行的压力

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

For many ophthalmologists glaucoma surgery is regarded as the last resort for their patients - chaotic, unreliable and with the potential to deplete the residual vision in both the short and the long term. Even glaucoma surgeons can be overheard lamenting their surgical obstacles and comparing their lot to their cataract surgery colleagues. Although cataract surgery is often regarded as the most successful surgical procedure in medicine, even without laser assistance, there is ample proof that glaucoma surgery does work and saves the sight of many every year in spite of its deficiencies. But glaucoma remains the second top cause of blindness hi the world and in Australia, and the most common cause of preventable blindness. So why do the new surgical operations for glaucoma not cause wholesale conversion of glaucoma surgeons when the current ones seem so flawed? One of the most compelling reasons is the disease itself - glaucoma is a highly variable pathology. Rates of progression vary substantially between patients and in the same person over the life of the disease. One treatment paradigm does not suit all patients with glaucoma, and tailor-making treatment is one of the key roles of the treating clinician. Successful treatment of glaucoma prevents loss of neurons and vision - something only conclusively established after a great number of years. The surrogate of lowering intraocular pressure (IOTP) is clearly flawed (although still offers us the best approximation of a 'lead index'). For eyes at low risk of loss of sight from glaucoma, the treatment options seem extensive and effective, but for those with high risk of loss of vision, not so. Eyes at high risk of (further) progression are often those that must endure glaucoma surgery in one of its forms. Actually glaucoma surgery has become more successful over the last decades with less complications, but the number of surgeons performing glaucoma surgery has fallen substantially.3 The glaucoma surgery repertoire has expanded with many more non-penetrating operations, revision procedures, tube and plate implants, and cyclodestructive procedures being performed than at any time in the past.
机译:对于许多眼科医生来说,青光眼手术被认为是患者的最后选择-混乱,不可靠,并且有可能在短期和长期内耗尽残余视力。甚至青光眼外科医生也可能会听到他们的手术障碍,并与白内障手术的同事进行比较。尽管白内障手术通常被认为是医学上最成功的外科手术方法,即使没有激光辅助,但有充分的证据表明,尽管存在白内障手术的不足,但每年仍能奏效并挽救许多人的视线。但是,青光眼仍然是全世界和澳大利亚造成失明的第二大原因,也是可预防失明的最常见原因。那么为什么新的青光眼外科手术在目前看来如此有缺陷的情况下却不引起青光眼外科医生的全面转换呢?最令人信服的原因之一是疾病本身-青光眼是高度可变的病理。在疾病的整个生命周期内,患者之间以及同一个人中进展的速度差异很大。一种治疗范例并不适合所有青光眼患者,量身定制的治疗是治疗临床医生的关键角色之一。青光眼的成功治疗可防止神经元和视力丧失-数年后才最终确定。降低眼内压(IOTP)的替代措施显然存在缺陷(尽管仍然可以为我们提供“铅指数”的最佳近似值)。对于青光眼视力丧失风险低的眼睛,治疗方法似乎广泛而有效,但对于视力丧失风险高的眼睛而言,则并非如此。处于(进一步)进展高风险的眼睛通常是必须经受其中一种形式的青光眼手术的眼睛。实际上,在过去的几十年中,青光眼手术已取得了更大的成功,并发症减少了,但是进行青光眼手术的外科医生人数却大大减少了。3随着更多的非穿透性手术,翻修手术,管板植入物的使用,青光眼手术的范围有所扩大。以及比过去任何时候都要执行的破坏性程序。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号