首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Differential Outcomes of Carotid Stenting and Endarterectomy Performed Exclusively by Vascular Surgeons in the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial (CREST)
【2h】

Differential Outcomes of Carotid Stenting and Endarterectomy Performed Exclusively by Vascular Surgeons in the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial (CREST)

机译:在颈动脉内膜切除术血管重建与支架术试验(CREsT)由血管外科医生专门执行颈动脉支架术和动脉内膜切除术的预后差

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

ObjectiveOutcomes in CREST did not differ between carotid artery stenting (CAS) and carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for the composite primary endpoint of stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), or death during the periprocedural period or ipsilateral stroke within four years. Rigorous credentialing and training of interventionists, including vascular surgeons, was required for the randomization phase of CREST. Because the lead-in phase of CREST had suggested higher perioperative risks after CAS performed by vascular surgeons, the purpose of this analysis was to examine differences in outcomes after randomization between CAS and CEA performed by vascular surgeons.
机译:目的卒中,心肌梗塞(MI)或围手术期或同侧中风在四年内死亡的复合主要终点在颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)和颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)之间,CREST的结果无差异。 CREST的随机化阶段需要对包括血管外科医生在内的干预人员进行严格的资格认证和培训。由于CREST的导入阶段提示血管外科医师进行CAS后的围手术期风险较高,因此该分析的目的是检查由血管外科医师进行CAS和CEA随机分组后结果的差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号