首页> 外文期刊>新薬と臨牀 >Low-Dose Transdermal Buprenorphine for Low Back Pain An Enriched Enrollment Randomized Withdrawal Placebo-Controlled Study
【24h】

Low-Dose Transdermal Buprenorphine for Low Back Pain An Enriched Enrollment Randomized Withdrawal Placebo-Controlled Study

机译:低剂量透皮丁丙诺啡用于腰痛的丰富研究,随机抽取,安慰剂对照研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objectives : The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety profile of the buprenorphine transdermal system (BTDS) with placebo in patients with moderate to severe low back pain. Methods : In this enrich enrollment randomized withdrawal design study, the subjects who demonstrated analgesic benefit from and tolerability to BTDS treatment in an open-label run-in phase were randomized to receive either BTDS or a matching placebo during a 12-week double-blind phase. The primary efficacy variable was defined as the time to inadequate pain relief. Results : Time to inadequate pain relief was significantly longer for the BTDS group versus the placebo group (P = 0.0025). Kaplan-Maier estimates of time-to-event showed that the proportion of subjects who experienced inadequate pain relief in the placebo group reach 25% by Day 9 ; while the proportion of subjects in the BTDS group did not reach 25% by Day 85 (the end of the double-blind phase), though the median survival times were not estimated for either group. The proportion of subjects with inadequate pain relief during the double-blind phase, one of the secondary efficacy variables, was significantly lower in the BTDS group compared with the placebo group (Placebo : 44.9%, BTDS : 21.7%, P = 0.0064). The most common adverse events which occurred during BTDS exposure in this study were opioid-related adverse events (nausea/ vomiting) and application site reactions. Conclusion : BTDS was effective in the treatment of subjects with moderate to severe low back pain. Adverse events observed in this study were generally well tolerated.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是比较丁丙诺啡经皮系统(BTDS)与安慰剂在中度至重度下腰痛患者中的疗效和安全性。方法:在这项丰富的入组随机退出设计研究中,在开放标签磨合期显示镇痛作用并耐受BTDS治疗的受试者被随机分配为在12周的双盲期间接受BTDS或匹配的安慰剂相。主要功效变量定义为疼痛缓解不足的时间。结果:与安慰剂组相比,BTDS组缓解疼痛的时间明显更长(P = 0.0025)。 Kaplan-Maier对事件发生时间的估计表明,到第9天,安慰剂组中疼痛缓解不足的受试者比例达到25%。 BTDS组的受试者比例到第85天(双盲阶段结束)仍未达到25%,尽管两组中的中位生存时间均未估算。与安慰剂组相比,BTDS组中双盲阶段疼痛缓解不足的受试者比例(次要疗效变量之一)显着降低(安慰剂:44.9%,BTDS:21.7%,P = 0.0064)。在这项研究中,暴露于BTDS期间最常见的不良事件是与阿片类药物有关的不良事件(恶心/呕吐)和应用部位反应。结论:BTDS可有效治疗中度至重度下腰痛。在这项研究中观察到的不良事件通常被很好地耐受。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号