首页> 外文期刊>藥學雜誌 >Subject making and evaluation method for objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) in pharmaceutical practice
【24h】

Subject making and evaluation method for objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) in pharmaceutical practice

机译:药学实践中客观结构化临床检查的主题制定与评价方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The aim of this study was to discuss subject selection and the evaluation method for an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) in pharmaceutical sciences. We designed the OSCE to assess pharmaceutical students' clinical ability. In this trial, there are three stations (ST1 in circle: dispensing powdered medicine, ST2 in circle: patient reception, ST3 in circle: drug counseling), and 25 students and six instructors participated. Each student took an examination at two stations, and evaluated other students at the other station. Each instructor evaluated the student at two stations. Before the evaluation, we developed a checklist that contained the items "evaluation of the quantity" of the action, "evaluation of the quality" of the skill and the attitude, and overall evaluation OSCE trial, we calculated and analyzed each examinee's evaluation score. In ST1 in circle and ST3 in circle, the average time for performance exceeded the time limit (5 min). There was no significant relationship betweenthe each examinee's evaluation score and the time at all stations. The evaluation point "evaluation of the quantity" did not differ among evaluators, but a difference was seen in the "evaluation of the quality." In addition, in the quantitative evaluation, there was a difference in the evaluation of the item for which the evaluator's judgment was necessary. Instructors' evaluations were more severer than students'. In the "overall evaluation," there was no significant relation between the quantitative evaluation score and the score of the overall impression. However, there was a significant relationship with the qualitative evaluation. From these results, for assignment making, it is necessary for examinees to finish the work within the time limit, and that the evaluation not affect the performance time. Additionally, it is necessary to standardize the evaluation to reduce differences among evaluators, who should be trained. Moreover, it was suggested that the selection of an appropriate evaluation system foreach evaluation item is important in OSCE stations.
机译:这项研究的目的是讨论药物科学中客观结构化临床检查(OSCE)的主题选择和评估方法。我们设计了OSCE来评估药学专业学生的临床能力。在该试验中,有3个工作站(ST1圈:散剂,ST2圈:患者接待,ST3圈:药物咨询),共有25名学生和6名讲师参加。每个学生在两个站点进行考试,并在另一个站点对其他学生进行评估。每位讲师在两个站点对学生进行了评估。在评估之前,我们制定了一个清单,其中包含动作的“数量评估”,技能和态度的“质量评估”以及OSCE总体评估项目,我们计算并分析了每个考生的评估得分。在ST1圈和ST3圈中,平均表演时间超过了时间限制(5分钟)。每个考生的评估分数与所有站点的时间之间没有显着关系。评估者之间的评估点“数量评估”没有差异,但是在“质量评估”中发现差异。另外,在定量评价中,在需要评价者判断的项目的评价中存在差异。教师的评价比学生的评价更为严格。在“总体评价”中,定量评价得分与总体印象得分之间没有显着关系。但是,与定性评估之间存在显着关系。根据这些结果,为进行作业,考生必须在规定的时间内完成工作,并且评估不得影响表演时间。此外,有必要对评估进行标准化以减少评估者之间的差异,评估者应接受培训。此外,有人建议,在欧安组织台站中,为每个评价项目选择适当的评价系统很重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号