...
首页> 外文期刊>臨床病理 >Evaluation of SMBG values using various instruments and clinical significance of forearm SMBG measurement
【24h】

Evaluation of SMBG values using various instruments and clinical significance of forearm SMBG measurement

机译:使用各种仪器评估SMBG值以及前臂SMBG测量的临床意义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Whole blood or plasma glucose values were compared between those measured using various instruments for SMBG and automated analyses in samples (antecubital vein) from 20 approximately 70 years old obtained at cookie tests. A good correlation between values in whole blood SMBG and plasma automated analyses values greater than r = 0.94 was observed for instruments A, C, F, and H, and the per cent difference from the automated values was less than 5% for A, B, E and H. Per cent difference of SMBG values by I was -16% in whole blood and -9% in plasma, suggesting the possibility of measuring real values in whole blood. With plasma, a good correlation greater than r = 0.95 was noted for A, C, F and K, and the per cent difference less than 10% was noted for C, E, F and I. A relatively good correlation (r: 0.63 approximately 0.90) between forearm SMBG value and plasma automated values was noted with the % difference of the mean less than 11%. During cookie test, there is no significant difference between forearm SMBG values and antecubital plasma automated values. Values at finger tips are significantly greater by 5 approximately 20% over automated plasma values. In conclusion, whole blood values by most of the SMBG instruments are well correlated with plasma automated values, although some disagreement was noted. Values at forearm are not different from plasma val ues of antecubital vein, while at finger tip SMBG values showed higher levels. The measurement at forearm is therefore recommended, and in addition the pain is less.
机译:将全血或血浆葡萄糖值与使用各种SMBG仪器测量的值和通过cookie测试获得的20岁左右(约70岁)的样本(肘静脉)自动分析之间进行比较。对于仪器A,C,F和H,全血SMBG值与血浆自动分析值之间的良好相关性大于r = 0.94,对于A,B,与自动值的百分比差异小于5%。 ,E和H。我的SMBG值在全血中的百分比差异为-16%,在血浆中为-9%,这表明有可能测量全血中的实际值。在血浆中,A,C,F和K的相关系数大于r = 0.95,而C,E,F和I的百分比差异小于10%。相关性相对较好(r:0.63注意到前臂SMBG值与血浆自动值之间的大约0.90的差异,平均值的百分比差异小于11%。在曲奇测试期间,前臂SMBG值和肘前血浆自动化值之间没有显着差异。与自动血浆值相比,指尖的值显着提高了约5个20%。总之,尽管注意到了一些分歧,但大多数SMBG仪器的全血值与血浆自动值具有很好的相关性。前臂的值与肘前静脉的血浆值无差异,而指尖的SMBG值显示较高水平。因此,建议在前臂进行测量,此外,疼痛程度也较小。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号