...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical and Experimental Immunology: An Official Journal of the British Society for Immunology >Subcutaneous immunoglobulin (16 or 20%) therapy in obese patients with primary immunodeficiency: A retrospective analysis of administration by infusion pump or subcutaneous rapid push
【24h】

Subcutaneous immunoglobulin (16 or 20%) therapy in obese patients with primary immunodeficiency: A retrospective analysis of administration by infusion pump or subcutaneous rapid push

机译:肥胖原发性免疫缺陷患者的皮下免疫球蛋白(16%或20%)治疗:输液泵或皮下快速推注给药的回顾性分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

A retrospective chart review was conducted at a single centre, capturing data on 173 primary immunodeficiency disease (PIDD) patients, including 40 obese patients, using subcutaneous administration of immunoglobulin (Ig) (SCIG) (16 or 20%) delivered by infusion pump or subcutaneous (s.c.) rapid push. Patients previously using Ig administered as intravenous (i.v.) infusions (IVIG) were converted to SCIG dosing on a 1:1 basis. In both obese and non-obese patients, mean serum Ig levels were higher during SCIG administration (steady state) compared with IVIG administration (trough values). Similar SCIG dose:serum IgG level relationships were observed between obese and non-obese patients, suggesting the consistent bioavailability of SCIG regardless of body mass index (BMI). The mean SCIG volume per dosing site and the mean number of dosing days per week were greater with s.c. rapid push compared with infusion pump in this cohort, but the mean number of sites per infusion session was lower with s.c. rapid push. Both methods were well tolerated. The use of 20 versus 16% SCIG in obese patients improved dosing efficiency, resulting in smaller weekly volumes (54·7 versus 74·5ml/week) and dosing on fewer days per week (2·3 versus 3·4 days). These data do not suggest a need for SCIG dosing adjustments in obese individuals relative to non-obese patients. The administration of SCIG using either infusion pump or s.c. rapid push is a practical and well-tolerated alternative to IVIG in obese patients. Offering various administration techniques provides a greater opportunity for treatment satisfaction and patient empowerment, which may support high levels of patient compliance.
机译:在单个中心进行回顾性图表审查,使用皮下注射输注泵或注射免疫球蛋白(Ig)(SCg)(16%或20%)收集了173例原发性免疫缺陷疾病(PIDD)患者(包括40例肥胖患者)的数据皮下(sc)快速推动。以前将Ig用作静脉输注(IVIG)的患者将以1:1的比例转换为SCIG剂量。在肥胖和非肥胖患者中,SCIG给药(稳态)期间的平均血清Ig水平高于IVIG给药(谷值)。肥胖和非肥胖患者之间观察到相似的SCIG剂量:血清IgG水平关系,这表明无论体重指数(BMI)如何,SCIG的生物利用度都是一致的。每个给药部位的平均SCIG量和每周平均给药天数大于s.c.在该队列中,与输液泵相比,快速推动的速度更快,但每次输注时间的平均位数在s.c较低。快速推动。两种方法均耐受良好。在肥胖患者中使用20%到16%的SCIG可以提高给药效率,从而每周剂量较小(54·7对74·5ml /周),每周给药的天数更少(2·3对3·4天)。这些数据并不表明相对于非肥胖患者,肥胖个体需要SCIG剂量调整。使用输液泵或s.c.对于肥胖患者,快速推入是IVIG的一种实用且耐受性良好的替代方法。提供各种管理技术可为治疗满意度和患者赋权提供更大的机会,这可以支持高水平的患者依从性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号