Surgical educator preferences regarding key objective structured clinical examination topics.

摘要

BACKGROUND: Numerous methods are used for assessing the performance of surgical residents and students. Unfortunately, these same methods are often unsatisfactory. One technique that is gaining increased favor is the Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE). It is unclear what areas of evaluation might best be included in such an examination so as to optimize its value. Therefore, this study evaluated the opinions of an international body of surgical educators. METHODS: A survey was distributed to 674 attending surgical educators; it asked respondents to select and rank the five most important topics from four areas. These areas included 84 topics from History Taking, Physical Examination, Data Interpretation, and Surgical Technique. A weighted score was calculated for each topic by assigning points according to a Likert scale ranking. RESULTS: Among 674 surveys distributed, 243 responses (36.1%) were received; 25 of the 243 responses were excluded, for a usable response rate of 218/674 (32.3%). The five highest ranked topics were (History Taking) "abdominal pain" 29.2%, "breast mass" 10.8%, "gastrointestinal bleeding" 8.5%, "bowel obstruction" 8.5%, "trauma" 7.2%; (Physical Examination) "acute abdomen" 28.9%, "trauma survey" 18.2%, "breast examination" 15.8%, "peripheral vascular" 8.9%, "cardiopulmonary" 7.5%; (Data Interpretation) "chest X ray" 21%, "abdominal series" 20.2%, "CT scan" 19.6%, "mammogram" 10.1%, "cervical spine films" 5.2%; and (Surgical Technique) "central line" 16.1%, "basic suture skills" 14.2%, "bowel anastomosis" 8.0%, "informed consent" 7.9%, "intubation" 6.4%. CONCLUSION: This survey offers useful data regarding those skills viewed as most important by experienced surgical educators, and offers guidelines for composition of surgical OSCEs.