首页> 外文期刊>Clinical and experimental nephrology >How to treat patients with systemic amyloid light chain amyloidosis? Comparison of high-dose melphalan, low-dose chemotherapy and no chemotherapy in patients with or without cardiac amyloidosis.
【24h】

How to treat patients with systemic amyloid light chain amyloidosis? Comparison of high-dose melphalan, low-dose chemotherapy and no chemotherapy in patients with or without cardiac amyloidosis.

机译:系统性淀粉样蛋白轻链淀粉样变性患者应如何治疗?有或没有心脏淀粉样变性患者的大剂量美法仑,小剂量化学疗法和不进行化学疗法的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: High-dose melphalan and autologous stem cell transplantation (HDM) is an effective treatment for systemic amyloid light chain (AL) amyloidosis but the eligibility criteria exclude many patients with this disorder. The aim of this study was to determine appropriate treatment strategies for systemic AL amyloidosis according to each patient's clinical condition in Japan. METHODS: Historical cohort study. Fifty-three patients with systemic AL amyloidosis (those with malignancies were excluded) were treated in our hospital with HDM (15 patients), melphalan + prednisolone (MP) (17 patients), vincristine + adriamycin + dexamethasone (VAD) (11 patients), or supportive treatment (no chemotherapy, 10 patients). We compared the survival rates among these treatment groups. RESULTS: Mean survival was significantly longer in the HDM group than in the other three groups (P < 0.01, log-rank test). This trend remained the same when patients were divided into those with and without cardiac amyloid involvement. Furthermore, in patients with heart involvement, survival in the VAD therapy group was significantly inferior to that in the MP therapy group (P < 0.01 by log-rank test). Significant factors related to the survival rate included the presence or absence of heart involvement and treatment modality. CONCLUSIONS: HDM should be considered the treatment of choice in eligible patients with systemic AL amyloidosis even in the presence of cardiac amyloidosis. If HDM is not eligible, indications for VAD therapy should be carefully evaluated in patients with cardiac amyloidosis.
机译:背景:大剂量马法兰和自体干细胞移植(HDM)是治疗系统性淀粉样蛋白轻链(AL)淀粉样变性的有效方法,但符合资格的标准排除了许多患有这种疾病的患者。这项研究的目的是根据日本每位患者的临床情况确定适合系统性AL淀粉样变性的治疗策略。方法:历史队列研究。我院对53例系统性AL淀粉样变性患者(排除恶性肿瘤)进行了HDM治疗(15例),美法仑+泼尼松龙(MP)(17例),长春新碱+阿霉素+地塞米松(VAD)(11例)或支持治疗(无化疗,10例患者)。我们比较了这些治疗组的存活率。结果:HDM组的平均生存期明显长于其他三组(P <0.01,对数秩检验)。当将患者分为有和没有心脏淀粉样变的患者时,这种趋势保持不变。此外,在有心脏受累的患者中,VAD治疗组的生存期显着低于MP治疗组(对数秩检验,P <0.01)。与存活率有关的重要因素包括心脏受累与否以及治疗方式。结论:即使在存在心脏淀粉样变性病的情况下,对于符合条件的系统性AL淀粉样变性病患者,也应考虑将HDM作为治疗的选择。如果HDM不符合条件,则应在心脏淀粉样变性患者中仔细评估VAD治疗的适应症。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号