首页> 外文期刊>Journal of surgical education >Factors influencing scholarly impact: Does urology fellowship training affect research output?
【24h】

Factors influencing scholarly impact: Does urology fellowship training affect research output?

机译:影响学术影响力的因素:泌尿科奖学金培训是否会影响研究成果?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose Residents seek postresidency fellowship training to increase competency with novel surgical techniques and augment their fund of knowledge. Research productivity is a vital component of advancement in academic urology. Our objectives were to use the h-index (an objective and readily available bibliometric that has been repeatedly shown to correlate with scholarly impact, funding procurement, and academic promotion in urology as well as other specialties) to determine whether any relationship exists between fellowship training and scholarly impact among academic urologists. Additional examination was performed to determine whether any differences in scholarly influence are present among practitioners in the major urologic subspecialties. Materials and Methods Overall, 851 faculty members from 101 academic urology departments were organized by academic rank and fellowship completed. Research productivity was calculated using the h-index, calculated from the Scopus database. Results There was no statistical difference in h-index found between fellowship-trained and nonfellowship-trained academic urologists. The highest h-indices were seen among urologic oncologists (18.1 ± 0.95) and nonfellowship-trained urologists (14.62 ± 0.80). Nearly 70% of department chairs included in this analysis were urologic oncologists or general urologists. Conclusions No difference in h-index existed between fellowship-trained and nonfellowship-trained urologists, although practitioners in the subspecialty cohorts with the highest research productivity (nonfellowship-trained and urologic oncologists) comprised 70% of department chairpersons. This relationship suggests that a strong research profile is highly valued during selection for academic promotion. Differences existed on further comparison by subspecialty. Fellowship training may represent another potential opportunity to introduce structured research experiences for trainees.
机译:目的居民寻求居留后研究金培训,以通过新颖的手术技术提高能力,并增加其知识储备。研究生产力是学术泌尿外科发展的重要组成部分。我们的目标是使用h指数(客观且容易获得的文献计量法,已反复显示出与学术影响,资金采购,泌尿外科以及其他专业的学术发展相关联),以确定奖学金培训之间是否存在任何关系和学术泌尿科医师之间的学术影响。进行了进一步的检查,以确定在主要泌尿科专业中的从业者之间学术影响力是否存在差异。资料与方法总体而言,按学术等级组织了101个泌尿外科科室的851名教职员工,并完成了研究金。使用从Scopus数据库计算的h指数计算研究生产率。结果接受过研究金和非研究金学历的泌尿科医师在h指数上没有统计学差异。在泌尿科肿瘤科医生中(18.1±0.95)和未接受研究金的泌尿科医师(14.62±0.80)中,h指数最高。该分析包括的部门主席中,将近70%是泌尿科肿瘤科医生或普通泌尿科医师。结论接受过研究金和非研究金的泌尿科医师之间的h指数没有差异,尽管研究生产率最高的专科研究组(非研究金和泌尿科肿瘤医师)的执业者占部门主席的70%。这种关系表明,在进行学术晋升的甄选过程中,很重要的研究概况受到高度重视。通过亚专业的进一步比较存在差异。研究金培训可能是向学员介绍结构化研究经验的另一个潜在机会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号