...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of surgical education >Surgical skills acquisition among left-handed trainees - True inferiority or unfair assessment: A preliminary study
【24h】

Surgical skills acquisition among left-handed trainees - True inferiority or unfair assessment: A preliminary study

机译:惯用左手的受训者掌握手术技能-真正的自卑或不公平的评估:初步研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Introduction: Studies involving the formal assessment of surgical skills have often reported inferior abilities among left-handed surgical trainees (LHT). Most surgical training curricula and assessment methods, however, are inherently geared toward right-handed trainees (RHT); potentially placing LHT at both a training and assessment disadvantage. We evaluated the effect of a hand dominance-based curriculum for acquisition of basic suturing and knot tying skills among medical students. Methods: After Institutional Review Board approval, first- and second-year medical students from the University of California, Irvine School of Medicine were recruited to participate in a basic suturing and knot tying skills course. Consenting students were randomized to either a left-handed curriculum or a right-handed curriculum consisting of (1) a 30-minute introductory video and (2) a 2-hour instructor-led, hands-on training session on basic suturing and knot tying. All instructional methods, instruments, and instructors were exclusively right-handed or left-handed for the right-handed curriculum or left-handed curriculum, respectively. Students were assessed on the performance of 2 suturing tasks, continuous running suturing and instrument knot tying, and performance assessments were conducted both immediately and 2 weeks posttraining. Results: A total of 19 students completed the training course and both assessments (8 LHT, 11 RHT). Students randomized to a curriculum "concordant" with their hand dominance performed significantly better than those randomized to a "discordant" curriculum on both tasks (p < 0.01). This difference was found at both immediate and 2 weeks posttraining assessments. Within concordant and discordant groups, there were no significant differences between LHT and RHT. Conclusions: This preliminary study demonstrates that medical students, both LHT and RHT, immersed in a training environment that is discordant with their hand dominance might have inferior acquisition of basic suturing and knot tying skills. ? 2012 Association of Program Directors in Surgery.
机译:简介:涉及对外科手术技能进行正式评估的研究通常报告左撇子外科手术学员(LHT)的能力较差。然而,大多数外科手术培训课程和评估方法本质上是针对右撇子学员(RHT)的;可能将LHT置于训练和评估的劣势。我们评估了基于手优势的课程对医学生基本缝合和打结技巧的掌握效果。方法:经过机构审查委员会的批准,招募了来自加利福尼亚大学欧文分校医学院的一年级和二年级医学生,以参加基本的缝合和打结技巧课程。同意的学生被随机分为左撇子课程或右撇子课程,这些课程包括(1)30分钟的入门视频和(2)2小时的讲师指导的关于基本缝合和打结的动手培训课程绑。对于右手课程或左手课程,所有的教学方法,工具和讲师分别是右撇子或左撇子。对学生进行两项缝合任务,连续跑步缝合和器械打结的性能评估,并在培训后立即和培训后两周进行了绩效评估。结果:共有19名学生完成了培训课程并完成了两项评估(8个LHT,11个RHT)。在两个任务上随机分配到“手风琴”课程的学生的表现要明显好于随机分配到“不和风”课程的学生(p <0.01)。在培训后立即评估和2周评估中都发现了这种差异。在一致和不一致组中,LHT和RHT之间没有显着差异。结论:这项初步研究表明,LHT和RHT的医学生若沉浸在与其手部优势不符的训练环境中,其基本的缝合和打结技巧将较差。 ? 2012年外科程序主管协会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号