首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems: Theory & Application >Lazy Multi-label Learning Algorithms Based on Mutuality Strategies
【24h】

Lazy Multi-label Learning Algorithms Based on Mutuality Strategies

机译:基于互惠策略的懒惰多标签学习算法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Lazy multi-label learning algorithms have become an important research topic within the multi-label community. These algorithms usually consider the set of standard k-Nearest Neighbors of a new instance to predict its labels (multi-label). The prediction is made by following a voting criteria within the multi-labels of the set of k-Nearest Neighbors of the new instance. This work proposes the use of two alternative strategies to identify the set of these examples: the Mutual and Not Mutual Nearest Neighbors rules, which have already been used by lazy single-learning algorithms. In this work, we use these strategies to extend the lazy multi-label algorithm BRkNN. An experimental evaluation carried out to compare both mutuality strategies with the original BRkNN algorithm and the well-known MLkNN lazy algorithm on 15 benchmark datasets showed that MLkNN presented the best predictive performance for the Hamming-Loss evaluation measure, although it was significantly outperformed by the mutuality strategies when F-Measure is considered. The best results of the lazy algorithms were also compared with the results obtained by the Binary Relevance approach using three different base learning algorithms.
机译:惰性多标签学习算法已成为多标签社区中的重要研究主题。这些算法通常考虑新实例的标准k最近邻居的集合,以预测其标签(多标签)。通过遵循新实例的k个最近邻居集合的多标签内的投票标准进行预测。这项工作提出了使用两种替代策略来标识这些示例的集合:相互和非相互最近邻居规则,这些规则已被惰性单学习算法使用。在这项工作中,我们使用这些策略来扩展惰性多标签算法BRkNN。在15个基准数据集上进行的实验评估将两种互惠策略与原始BRkNN算法和著名的MLkNN惰性算法进行了比较,结果表明MLkNN表现出最佳的Hamming-Loss评估指标预测性能,尽管它的性能明显优于考虑F度量时的互惠策略。还将懒惰算法的最佳结果与使用三种不同基础学习算法的“二进制相关性”方法获得的结果进行了比较。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号