首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Wildlife Management >Collective action and social capital of wildlife management associations.
【24h】

Collective action and social capital of wildlife management associations.

机译:野生动物管理协会的集体行动和社会资本。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In areas with dense landownership patterns, management of white-tailed deer (Odocoilcus virginianus) depends upon collective decision making of landowners and hunters. To resolve conflicts associated with this commons dilemma, wildlife management associations (WMAs) have become a popular mechanism for coordinating wildlife management decisions in private land states, especially in Texas, USA. Social capital, represented by metrics such as trust, reciprocity, and community involvement, has been identified as an important determinant of the success of collaborative institutional arrangements. To determine the influence of social capital on the effectiveness of WMAs, we address 2 research questions: 1) do WMAs exhibit elements of social capital, and 2) what landowner characteristics affect elements of social capital within WMAs? We used a mail survey questionnaire to determine the effect of various factors on the activities and management practices in 4 WMAs in 2 regions in Texas: the Lower Post Oak Savannah (LPOS) and the Central Post Oak Savannah (CPOS). The LPOS landowners were members of larger associations, had generally acquired their land more recently, held more frequent meetings, and tended to have longer association membership than CPOS landowners, yet they exhibited lower social capital. The CPOS landowners owned significantly larger properties, and were predominantly absentee wealthy males that considered relaxation and hunting more important land uses than property ownership for a place to live. The smaller group size of the CPOS associations may be the most important factor in building and maintaining social capital. Intra-association trust, a primary measure of social capital, was positively influenced by the longevity of property ownership, the number of association meetings, the percentage of males in the association, and other factors. Conversely, negative influences on trust included absentee ownership and the proportion of woodland habitat present in each WMA. We suggest that deer are a common-pool resource whose populations are dependent upon collective action by stakeholders. Social capital building within landowner associations could facilitate the sustainable harvest of quality deer and possibly lead to cooperative management of other common-pool natural resources.
机译:在土地所有权密集的地区,白尾鹿(Odocoilcus virginianus)的管理取决于土地所有者和猎人的集体决策。为了解决与公地困境相关的冲突,野生动物管理协会(WMA)已成为在私有土地州(尤其是在美国得克萨斯州)协调野生生物管理决策的流行机制。以信任,互惠和社区参与等指标为代表的社会资本已被确定为合作机构安排成功与否的重要决定因素。为了确定社会资本对WMA有效性的影响,我们要解决两个研究问题:1)WMA是否表现出社会资本的要素,以及2)哪些土地所有者特征会影响WMA中的社会资本的要素?我们使用邮件调查问卷来确定各种因素对德克萨斯州2个地区(下橡树大草原地区(LPOS)和中橡树大草原地区(CPOS))中4个WMA的活动和管理实践的影响。 LPOS地主是较大的协会的成员,通常较新地获得土地,举行更频繁的会议,与CPOS地主相比,协会会员的时间更长,但其社会资本却较低。 CPOS的土地所有者拥有明显更大的财产,并且主要是缺席的富裕男性,他们认为放松和寻找比居住地的财产所有权更重要的土地用途。 CPOS协会的团体规模较小可能是建立和维护社会资本的最重要因素。协会内部信任是衡量社会资本的主要指标,它受到财产所有权的寿命,协会会议的次数,协会中男性的比例以及其他因素的积极影响。相反,对信任的负面影响包括缺席所有权和每个WMA中林地栖息地的比例。我们建议,鹿是一种公共池塘资源,其种群取决于利益相关者的集体行动。土地所有者协会内部的社会资本建设可以促进优质鹿的可持续收获,并有可能导致其他共同池塘自然资源的合作管理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号