...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research >What factors influence applicants' rankings of orthopaedic surgery residency programs in the National Resident Matching Program?
【24h】

What factors influence applicants' rankings of orthopaedic surgery residency programs in the National Resident Matching Program?

机译:哪些因素会影响申请人在国家居民匹配计划中对整形外科住院医师计划的排名?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: In accordance with the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons' strategic goal of enriching our field by building a more diverse orthopaedic workforce, the specialty needs further information delineating the factors important to the applicant pool as a whole and more specifically to women and other underrepresented minority groups. Questions/purposes: This study aims to identify (1) factors important to residency applicants selecting an orthopaedic residency program; (2) differences in factor importance for men, women, and minorities, and (3) the importance of different information sources used when making his or her rank list. Methods: All 742 applicants who applied to the authors' orthopaedic surgery residency program in the 2013 National Resident Matching Program were queried. The response rate was 28% (207 of 742). Respondents were asked to rank, on a 5-point Likert scale, 37 factors that may have affected their rank lists to differing degrees. Respondents also identified the importance of sources of information used to make their rank lists, factors that residency programs considered important when ranking applicants, and their level of agreement with various sex- and racial-specific statements regarding orthopaedic training. Results: The most important factors affecting rank lists were perceived happiness/quality of life of current residents, resident camaraderie, and impression after an away rotation. Women weighed their personal interactions and a program's proximity to family and friends more heavily when determining a rank list. Sixty-eight percent of women eliminated residency programs from their options based on perceived sex biases versus less than 1% of men. Applicants valued information obtained from away rotations at an institution and in talking with current residents most when determining his or her rank list. Conclusions: Programs should consider interpersonal factors, like quality of life and resident camaraderie as factors in attracting applicants. They also should minimize perceived biases and emphasize interactions with current residents during the application process to meet their goals of attracting an exceptional and more diverse orthopaedic workforce.
机译:背景:根据美国骨科医师学会通过建立更多样化的骨科医师队伍来丰富我们的领域的战略目标,该专业需要进一步的信息来描述对申请人整体而言更重要的因素,尤其是对女性和其他代表性不足的因素少数群体。问题/目的:这项研究旨在确定(1)对选择骨科住院医师计划的住院医师重要的因素; (2)对男性,女性和少数族裔的因素重要性差异,以及(3)在制定其排名列表时使用的不同信息来源的重要性。方法:查询了2013年全国居民匹配计划中向作者的骨科手术住院计划申请的742名申请人。回应率为28%(742之207)。要求受访者以5点李克特量表对可能影响其排名列表的37个因素进行不同程度的排名。受访者还确定了用于编制排名列表的信息源的重要性,居留程序在对申请人进行排名时认为重要的因素,以及他们对各种有关骨科培训的性别和种族特定表述的同意程度。结果:影响等级列表的最重要因素是当前居民的幸福感/生活质量,居民友情和轮换后的印象。在确定排行榜时,女性会更加权衡自己的个人互动和节目与亲朋好友的亲近程度。 68%的女性基于感知到的性别偏见而取消了居住计划,而男性的这一比例不到1%。申请人重视从机构轮换获得的信息,并在确定其行列时最常与当前居民交谈。结论:程序应考虑人际因素,例如生活质量和居民友情作为吸引申请人的因素。他们还应尽量减少感知的偏见,并强调在申请过程中与当前居民的互动,以实现其吸引超群且更加多样化的矫形劳动力的目标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号