首页> 外文期刊>Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research >Can a modified anterior external fixator provide posterior compression of AP compression type III pelvic injuries?
【24h】

Can a modified anterior external fixator provide posterior compression of AP compression type III pelvic injuries?

机译:改良的前部外固定器能否为AP压迫III型骨盆损伤提供向后压迫?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Current anterior fixators can close a disrupted anterior pelvic ring. However, these anterior constructs cannot create posterior compressive forces across the sacroiliac joint. We explored whether a modified fixator could create such forces. Questions/purposes: We determined whether (1) an anterior external fixator with a second anterior articulation (X-frame) would provide posterior pelvic compression and (2) full pin insertion would deliver higher posterior compressive forces than half pin insertion. Methods: We simulated AP compression Type III instability with plastic pelvis models and tested the following conditions: (1) single-pin supraacetabular external fixator (SAEF) using half pin insertion (60 mm); (2) SAEF using full pin insertion (120 mm); (3) modified fixator with X-frame using half pin insertion; (4) modified fixator using full pin insertion; and (5) C-clamp. Standardized fracture compression in the anterior and posterior compartment was performed as in previous studies by Gardner. A force-sensitive sensor was placed in the symphysis and posterior pelvic ring before fracture reduction and the fractures were reduced. The symphyseal and sacroiliac compression loads of each application were measured. Results: The SAEF exerted mean compressions of 13 N and 14 N to the posterior pelvic ring using half and full pin insertions, respectively. The modified fixator had mean posterior compressions of 174 N and 222 N with half and full pin insertions, respectively. C-clamp application exerted a mean posterior load of 407 N. Conclusions: Posterior compression on the pelvis was improved using an X-frame as an anterior fixation device in a synthetic pelvic fracture model. Clinical Relevance: This additive device may improve the initial anterior and posterior stability in the acute management of unstable and life-threatening pelvic ring injuries.
机译:背景:目前的前固定器可以闭合破裂的前骨盆环。但是,这些前部构造不能在across关节上产生后压缩力。我们研究了改良的固定器是否会产生这种力量。问题/目的:我们确定(1)具有第二前关节(X形框架)的前外固定器是否会提供骨盆后压,以及(2)完全销钉插入会比半销钉插入提供更高的后压缩力。方法:我们用塑料骨盆模型模拟了AP压迫III型不稳定性,并测试了以下条件:(1)使用半针插入(60 mm)的单针髋臼上固定器(SAEF); (2)SAEF使用全针插入(120毫米); (3)使用半销钉插入的带有X形框架的改良型固定器; (4)使用全针插入的改良固定器; (5)C型夹。与Gardner先前的研究一样,对前房和后房进行标准化骨折压缩。在骨折复位和骨折复位之前,将一个力敏传感器放置在骨干和骨盆后环中。测量每种应用的sym突和sa压缩负荷。结果:SAEF分别使用半针和全针插入对骨盆后环施加13 N和14 N的平均压迫。改良的固定器的后半部平均压缩力分别为174 N和222 N,分别有一半和完全的销钉插入。 C形夹施加平均407 N的后部负荷。结论:在合成骨盆骨折模型中,使用X形框架作为前固定装置可以改善骨盆的后压。临床意义:该辅助装置可以改善不稳定和危及生命的骨盆环损伤的急性处理中的前后稳定性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号