...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of vascular surgery >Acute abdominal aortic dissection: insight from the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD).
【24h】

Acute abdominal aortic dissection: insight from the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD).

机译:急性腹主动脉夹层:国际急性主动脉夹层注册表(IRAD)的见解。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Isolated acute dissection of the abdominal aorta is an unusual event that may present with several different clinical scenarios. Because its incidence is low, the natural history is unknown. We report data from the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD), the largest group of patients treated for acute aortic dissections. The aim of this study was to identify clinical characteristics, therapeutic approaches, risk factors for mortality, in-hospital outcome, and long-term results of this cohort, thus clarifying its natural history. METHODS: A comprehensive analysis of 290 clinical variables on 18 patients affected by isolated acute abdominal aortic dissection (IAAAD) was performed. Among 1417 patients enrolled in the IRAD from 1996 to 2003, 532 (37.5%) had an acute type B dissection, of which 18 (1.3%) had an IAAAD. Theor mean age was 67.7 +/- 13.3 years, with a male predominance (n = 12, 67%). Aortic aneurysms pre-existed in 5 patients (28%). IAAAD was iatrogenic in 2 cases (11%). RESULTS: Compared with patients with type B aortic dissections, abdominal pain, mesenteric ischemia or infarction, limb ischemia, and hypotension as initial clinical signs were significantly more frequent in patients with IAAAD, whereas chest pain was more typical in patients with type B dissections. No neurologic symptoms, such as ischemic spinal cord damage or ischemic peripheral neuropathy, occurred in the IAAAD cohort. The 18 IAAAD patients were medically, surgically, or percutaneously managed in 12 (66.6%), five (27.8%), and one (5.6%) cases, respectively. The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 5.6% (n = 1). The patient who died was medically managed. No deaths were reported among patients who underwent surgery or had an endovascular procedure, irrespective of their preoperative status. A mean follow-up of 5 years (range, 1 month to 9 years) was completed for 71% (12 of 17) of the patients. Four patients (33.3%) died during the 9-year follow-up period. Overall survival was 93.3% +/- 12.6% at 1year and 73.3% +/- 27.2% at 5 years. All patients who died during the follow-up period had in-hospital medical management (P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: IAAAD is a condition that may present differently compared with classic type B aortic dissections. IAAAD patients treated with surgical or endovascular procedures had a lower unadjusted in-hospital and long-term mortality rate compared with medically managed patients. On the basis of the present natural history report, continued surveillance appears mandatory. To improve the life expectancy of patients with IAAAD, aggressive surgical or endovascular management seems justified.
机译:背景:腹主动脉的急性急性分离是一种不寻常的事件,可能在几种不同的临床情况下出现。由于其发病率低,自然历史未知。我们报告了急性主动脉夹层国际注册处(IRAD)的数据,该组织是接受急性主动脉夹层治疗的最大患者群体。这项研究的目的是确定该队列的临床特征,治疗方法,死亡率,住院结局和长期结果的危险因素,从而阐明其自然史。方法:对孤立急性腹主动脉夹层(IAAAD)影响的18例患者的290个临床变量进行了综合分析。在1996年至2003年参加IRAD的1417例患者中,有532例(37.5%)患有急性B型夹层,其中18例(1.3%)患有IAAAD。理论平均年龄为67.7 +/- 13.3岁,男性占多数(n = 12,67%)。 5例患者中存在主动脉瘤(28%)。 IAAAD医源性2例(11%)。结果:与B型主动脉夹层相比,腹痛,肠系膜缺血或梗死,肢体缺血和低血压是IAAAD患者的初始临床体征,但B型夹层患者更为典型。在IAAAD队列中未发生神经系统症状,例如缺血性脊髓损伤或局部缺血性周围神经病。 18例IAAAD患者分别接受了12例(66.6%),5例(27.8%)和1例(5.6%)的内科,外科或经皮治疗。总体住院死亡率为5.6%(n = 1)。死者接受了医疗处理。接受手术或腔内手术的患者,无论其术前状态如何,均无死亡报告。 71%(17中的12)患者完成了5年(1个月至9年)的平均随访。在9年的随访期内,有4名患者(33.3%)死亡。 1年总生存率为93.3%+/- 12.6%,5年总生存率为73.3%+/- 27.2%。在随访期间死亡的所有患者均接受住院医疗管理(P = .04)。结论:与经典的B型主动脉夹层相比,IAAAD的表现可能有所不同。与药物治疗的患者相比,接受外科手术或血管内治疗的IAAAD患者的未经调整的住院和长期死亡率较低。根据目前的自然历史报告,必须继续进行监视。为了提高IAAAD患者的预期寿命,积极的外科手术或血管内治疗似乎是合理的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号