...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of vascular and interventional radiology: JVIR >Intraarticular hyaluronic acid versus glucocorticoid injections for nonradicular pain in the lumbar spine.
【24h】

Intraarticular hyaluronic acid versus glucocorticoid injections for nonradicular pain in the lumbar spine.

机译:关节内透明质酸与糖皮质激素的注射治疗腰椎非根治性疼痛。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

PURPOSE: To investigate the efficacy and safety of intraarticular sodium hyaluronate (SH) compared with intraarticular glucocorticoids (triamcinolone acetonide; TA) in the treatment of chronic nonradicular lumbar pain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty patients were included in this randomized, controlled, blind-observer clinical study and randomly assigned to two groups to receive 10 mg SH or 10 mg TA per facet joint. The facet joints on both sides at levels S1-L5, L5-L4, and L4-L3 were treated once per week under computed tomographic guidance. The study visits were timed to permit assessment of the immediate effect as well as possible carryover effects at 3 and 6 months after completion of treatment. Changes in pain were assessed with a visual analog scale (VAS) and changes in function and quality of life were assessed by the Roland Morris Questionnaire (RMQ), the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (ODQ), the Low Back Outcome Score (LBOS), and the Short Form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire. RESULTS: Patients reported lasting pain relief, better function, and improved quality of life with both treatments. Mann-Whitney analyses of the patient questionnaires (RMQ, ODQ, and LBOS) very consistently showed that SH is not inferior to TA. In addition, the efficacy of SH was largely comparable with that of TA on the VAS and SF-36. No adverse effects were reported after administration of the test products. The intraarticular treatment of facet joints (levels S1-L5, L5-L4, and L4-L3) with SH in patients with chronic nonradicular pain in the lumbar spine resulted in a marked reduction in pain with improved function and better quality of life, which was at least equal to the effect of a course of TA injections. SH-treated patients showed greater benefits in the long term. CONCLUSION: Intraarticular SH is a very promising new option for the treatment of patients with chronic nonradicular lumbar symptoms.
机译:目的:探讨关节腔内透明质酸钠(SH)与关节腔内糖皮质激素(曲安奈德(TA))治疗慢性非根源性腰痛的疗效和安全性。材料与方法:60名患者参加了这项随机,对照,盲人观察的临床研究,随机分为两组,每个小关节接受10 mg SH或10 mg TA。在计算机断层扫描指导下,每周一次对S1-L5,L5-L4和L4-L3级别的小关节进行治疗。安排研究访问的时间,以便在治疗完成后3个月和6个月内评估其即时效果以及可能的残留效果。使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估疼痛的变化,并通过Roland Morris问卷(RMQ),Oswestry残疾问卷(ODQ),低下位结果评分(LBOS)评估功能和生活质量的变化,简短表格36(SF-36)问卷。结果:两种疗法均能使患者持久缓解疼痛,改善功能并改善生活质量。 Mann-Whitney对患者问卷(RMQ,ODQ和LBOS)的分析非常一致地表明,SH并不逊色于TA。此外,SH在VAS和SF-36上的疗效与TA相当。服用受试产品后未见不良反应报告。在腰椎慢性非根治性疼痛患者中,关节内关节腔内治疗(S1-L5,L5-L4和L4-L3级)可显着减轻疼痛,改善功能,改善生活质量,至少等于一个疗程注射的效果。从长期来看,接受SH治疗的患者显示出更大的益处。结论:关节内SH是治疗慢性非放射性腰椎病患者的非常有希望的新选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号