...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of vascular and interventional radiology: JVIR >Hepatic arterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of survival rates with different embolic agents.
【24h】

Hepatic arterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of survival rates with different embolic agents.

机译:肝细胞癌的肝动脉化学栓塞:不同栓塞剂生存率的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

PURPOSE: The optimal embolic agent for transhepatic arterial chemoembolization (TACE) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has not been identified. This study reports outcomes of TACE for HCC with Gelfoam powder and polyvinyl alcohol (PVA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-one patients underwent 152 TACE sessions with Gelfoam powder (n = 41) or polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) and Ethiodol (n = 40) as the embolic agent. Chemotherapeutic drugs were the same for all patients (50 mg cisplatin, 20 mg doxorubicin, 10 mg mitomycin-c). The groups were compared based on number of TACE sessions, maximum tumor size, bilirubin level, aspartate and alanine aminotransferase levels, Child-Pugh score, Model for End-stage Liver Disease score, and hepatitis B or C virus positivity. The number of cases of each Child class in each group was also evaluated. Survival starting from the first TACE session was calculated according to Kaplan-Meier analysis. Forty-eight patients died during the study period, 19 received transplants, and 14 were alive at the end of the study period. RESULTS: The groups were statistically similar in all categories regarding liver function, Child-Pugh score, tumor size, hepatitis status, and percentage of patients with Child class A, B, and C disease. The number of TACE sessions was significantly greater for the Gelfoam powder group (mean, 2.2) versus the PVA group (mean, 1.6; P = .01). Overall survival was similar between groups whether patients who received transplants were included in the analysis (mean, 659 days +/- 83 with Gelfoam powder vs 565 days +/- 71 with PVA; P = .42) or were excluded (mean, 519 days +/- 80 with Gelfoam powder vs 511 days +/- 75 with PVA; P = .93). CONCLUSION: In similar patient groups, survival after treatment of HCC with TACE with Gelfoam powder or PVA and Ethiodol was similar.
机译:目的:尚未确定肝细胞癌(HCC)经肝动脉化学栓塞(TACE)的最佳栓塞剂。这项研究报告了使用Gelfoam粉末和聚乙烯醇(PVA)进行肝癌TACE的结果。材料与方法:81例患者接受了152次TACE疗程,其中使用Gelfoam散剂(n = 41)或聚乙烯醇(PVA)和Ethiodol(n = 40)作为栓塞剂。所有患者的化疗药物均相同(50 mg顺铂,20 mg阿霉素,10 mg丝裂霉素-c)。根据TACE次数,最大肿瘤大小,胆红素水平,天冬氨酸和丙氨酸氨基转移酶水平,Child-Pugh评分,终末期肝病模型评分以及乙型或丙型肝炎病毒阳性率对两组进行比较。还评估了每个组中每个Child类的病例数。根据Kaplan-Meier分析计算从第一个TACE会话开始的生存期。在研究期间有48名患者死亡,有19例接受了移植手术,在研究期末有14例还活着。结果:在肝功能,Child-Pugh评分,肿瘤大小,肝炎状况以及儿童A,B和C类儿童的百分比方面,各组在所有类别上的统计均相似。 Gelfoam粉末组的TACE会话数(平均值为2.2)明显高于PVA组(平均值为1.6; P = 0.01)。两组之间的总体生存率是相似的,是否接受移植的患者被纳入分析(平均659天+/- 83天使用明胶粉,而565天+/- 71天使用PVA; P = 0.42)或被排除在外(平均519天)使用Gelfoam粉末的+/- 80天,而使用PVA的511 +/- 75天; P = 0.93)。结论:在相似的患者组中,用明胶泡沫粉末或PVA和Ethiodol联合TACE治疗HCC后的生存率相似。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号