首页> 外文期刊>Journal of voice: official journal of the Voice Foundation >Oropharyngeal pH monitoring for laryngopharyngeal reflux: Is it a reliable test before therapy?
【24h】

Oropharyngeal pH monitoring for laryngopharyngeal reflux: Is it a reliable test before therapy?

机译:口咽pH值监测喉返流:治疗前是否可靠的测试?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objective: Current methods of measuring pharyngeal pH are problematic. The aim of the study was to assess the ability of the oropharyngeal pH monitoring (Restech) in predicting the response to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease-related laryngopharyngeal symptoms. Study Design: The study design is prospective and uncontrolled. Methods: Twenty-two consecutive naive patients with chronic laryngeal symptoms were enrolled. Reflux symptom index, fibrolaryngoscopy, and 24-hour oropharyngeal pH monitoring were performed. Both patients and laryngoscopist were blinded by the results of Restech. All the patients were given a 3-month therapy with pantoprazole of 40 mg twice a day and then repeated both the reflux symptom index and fibrolaryngoscopic evaluation. Patients were considered as responders if a five-point decrease in symptom score was recorded. Results: Thirteen of the 22 patients (59.1%) responded to therapy. Laryngoscopic findings did not correlate with the clinical improvement after the 3 months of PPI. Nine patients (40.9%) had a pathologic Restech study, and all resulted responsive to PPI; nine patients (40.9%) with a negative Restech were nonresponsive to PPI, and four patients (18.2%) despite a negative Restech resulted responsive to therapy. Responsive patients showed both a higher oropharyngeal acid exposure in orthostatic position and a higher Ryan score, compared with nonresponders (49.74 ± 58.11 vs 2.12 ± 0.0, P = 0.002). Considering responsiveness to medical therapy as the gold standard of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) for the diagnosis of LPR, Restech showed a sensitivity of 69% and a specificity of 100%. Conclusions: The high specificity and reasonable sensitivity of this technique make the Restech an interesting tool before therapy of patients with pharyngoesophageal reflux.
机译:目的:目前测量咽pH的方法是有问题的。这项研究的目的是评估口咽pH监测(Restech)预测患有胃食管反流疾病相关喉咽症状的患者对质子泵抑制剂(PPI)治疗的反应的能力。研究设计:研究设计是前瞻性且不受控制的。方法:连续纳入22例初次出现慢性喉部症状的初次患者。进行反流症状指数,纤维喉镜检查和24小时口咽pH监测。患者和喉镜医师对Restech的结果均视而不见。所有患者均接受每日两次两次的40mg pan托拉唑治疗,为期3个月,然后重复进行反流症状指数和纤维喉镜检查。如果记录到症状评分降低了五分,则将患者视为反应者。结果:22名患者中有13名(59.1%)对治疗有反应。 PPI 3个月后,喉镜检查结果与临床改善无关。 9例(40.9%)患者接受了病理学Restech研究,所有患者均对PPI产生反应; Restech阴性的9例(40.9%)对PPI无反应,尽管Restech阴性的4例(18.2%)对治疗有反应。与无反应者相比,有反应的患者在直立位的口咽酸暴露更高,而瑞安得分更高(49.74±58.11 vs 2.12±0.0,P = 0.002)。将对药物治疗的反应性作为诊断LPR的喉咽反流(LPR)的金标准,Restech的敏感性为69%,特异性为100%。结论:该技术的高特异性和合理的敏感性使Restech在治疗咽食管反流患者之前成为一种有趣的工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号