首页> 外文期刊>Journal of thoracic oncology: official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer >Same dataset, same conclusion, different in detail: Who's doing what from large public database?
【24h】

Same dataset, same conclusion, different in detail: Who's doing what from large public database?

机译:相同的数据集,相同的结论,不同的细节:谁在做大型公共数据库的工作?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We read with great interest the article by Yu et al. on the association of tuberculosis with lung cancer. This retrospective cohort study indispensably proved the positive relationship, thanks to the nationwide scale and large number of cases they analyzed from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Database. This administrative database has been widely used to produce scientific knowledge. From 2000 until 2009, no less than 383 articles have been published, and 29 (7.5%) of them are related to cancer. However, because it is publicly available, there is a chance that people from different groups work on the same topics from the same dataset at the same period. It coin-cidentally occurred when similar research by Wu et al. was published in the February 2011 issue of Cancer journal (Epublication by September 30, 2010).
机译:我们非常感兴趣地阅读了Yu等人的文章。结核与肺癌的关系这项回顾性队列研究必不可少地证明了这种正相关性,这要归功于其全国范围和从台湾国民健康保险数据库中分析的大量病例。该管理数据库已被广泛用于产生科学知识。从2000年到2009年,发表了不少于383篇文章,其中29篇(7.5%)与癌症有关。但是,由于它是公开可用的,因此不同群体的人们有可能在同一时期处理来自同一数据集的相同主题。当Wu等人进行类似的研究时,恰巧发生了这种情况。发表于2011年2月的《癌症》杂志(2010年9月30日出版)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号