...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Development Economics >Is democracy more expropriative than dictatorship? Tocquevillian wisdom revisited
【24h】

Is democracy more expropriative than dictatorship? Tocquevillian wisdom revisited

机译:民主比独裁统治更具有剥夺性吗?重新审视托克维尔人的智慧

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

We reexamine the incentive effect of political democracy on the tax rate by defining a political regime over two dimensions: the extent of the franchise and the extent that the redistribution of tax revenues is biased towards the rich. Standard Tocquevillian models assume that, even if there is limited franchise, there is no redistribution bias; from this, it follows that democracy is more expropriative than oligarchy because a poorer median voter opts for higher taxes. Introducing the realistic assumption of a redistribution bias, we find a countervailing effect: democratization decreases exploitation by the rich on the disenfranchised poor; since tax revenues are redistributed over a larger base, the median voter may gain less from redistributivetaxation (we call this the Olson effect).
机译:我们通过在两个维度上定义政治体制来重新审查政治民主对税率的激励作用:专营权的范围和税收收入的再分配偏向富人的程度。标准的Tocquevillian模型假设,即使特许经营权有限,也不会存在重新分配偏向。由此可见,民主制比寡头制更具有剥夺性,因为中位数的较差选民会选择更高的税率。在重新分配偏向的现实假设下,我们发现了一种抵消作用:民主化减少了富人对被剥夺权利的穷人的剥削;由于税收是在较大的基数上重新分配的,因此中位数选民可能会从重新分配税中获得较少的收益(我们称之为奥尔森效应)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号