...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of economic studies >Institutions and economic volatility: democracy versus risk of expropriation
【24h】

Institutions and economic volatility: democracy versus risk of expropriation

机译:制度与​​经济动荡:民主与被没收风险

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to decompose the effects of democracy and risk of expropriation on economic volatility.rnDesign/methodology/approach - The authors follow Acemouglu et al. and use settler mortality in former colonies in the seventeenth, eighteenth and nineteenth centuries as an instrument of "risk of expropriation," in addition to a democracy index to capture institutional effects on economic stability. Findings - The authors present empirical evidence that the economic performance of more centralized former European colonies is not more volatile than that of democratic ones, once the exogenous variation of expropriation risk across countries is included in the model Originality/value - The paper investigates the role of a spectrum of different institutions on economic stability. In this sense, the paper contributes to the literature analyzing the effect of property-rights protection, as measured by a risk-of-expropriation index, on the relation between democracy and economic stability.
机译:目的-本文的目的是分解民主和被没收风险对经济波动的影响。设计/方法/方法-作者遵循Acemouglu等人的观点。并使用民主指数来捕捉对经济稳定的制度影响,并将十七,十八和十九世纪前殖民地的定居者死亡率用作“被没收风险”的工具。调查结果-作者提供的经验证据表明,一旦模型中包含了各国之间的掠夺风险的外生变量,则集中程度更高的前欧洲殖民地的经济表现不会比民主殖民地的波动更大-本文研究了这一作用不同机构对经济稳定的看法。从这个意义上讲,本文有助于分析用产权征用风险指数衡量的产权保护对民主与经济稳定之间关系的影响的文献。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号